Military Psychology: Concepts, Trends and Interventions 2016
DOI: 10.4135/9789353885854.n14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value-based Leadership

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If they realize their professional discourse, the discourse participants do not use the certain spontaneity of reactions, actions, feelings, and sometimes sensibility. The findings show (Çakıroğlu, Caetano, & Costa, 2021, Pathak, Rani, & Goswami, 2016) that since every participant brings their individuality and uniqueness in the professional role they perform, all images and actions can be assigned externally.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If they realize their professional discourse, the discourse participants do not use the certain spontaneity of reactions, actions, feelings, and sometimes sensibility. The findings show (Çakıroğlu, Caetano, & Costa, 2021, Pathak, Rani, & Goswami, 2016) that since every participant brings their individuality and uniqueness in the professional role they perform, all images and actions can be assigned externally.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Aznacheeva & Mamonova (2017), "person's professional activity determines professional discourse is a combination of the corpus of texts united by the theme, thesaurus and professional worldview together with extralinguistic factors" (p. 33). Many scholars describe the professional discourse on the basis of its general characteristics (Beilinson, 2009, Couture, 1992, Chetverikova, 2020, Fakhrutdinova, 2008, Geluykens & Pelsmaekers, 1999, Kong, 2019, Polanyi, 1988, Ponomarenko, Magirovskaya, & Orlova, 2020, roles of discourse participants (Decock, De Wilde, Van Hoof, Van Praet, & Clerck, 2018, Van Durme, 2012, Pathak, Rani, & Goswami, 2016, typical features, lexical, grammatical, and stylistic qualities (Hoskins, 1985, Khramchenko, 2019, roles of discourse participants (Besley, Garlick, Lambert, & Tiffany, 2021, Irimiea, 2017, Sarangi, 2017. Some works are devoted to professional discourse of military officers (Çakıroğlu, Caetano, & Costa, 2021, Fuiorea, 2011, Kraft, 2019, Maltby & Thornham, 2012.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%