2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value-Based Care Has Not Resulted in Biased Patient Selection: Analysis of a Single Center’s Experience in the Care for Joint Replacement Bundle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Value-based care aims to lower healthcare costs associated with metastatic brain tumor management [ 4 ]. Important metrics used to gauge the effectiveness of value-based care approaches include minimizing hospital length of stay, optimizing discharge disposition, and reducing costs [ 5 , 6 ]. While statistical models that predict these value-based outcomes have been developed within various medical specialties, there is a lack of generalizability of these models for practical use in the metastatic brain tumor population [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Value-based care aims to lower healthcare costs associated with metastatic brain tumor management [ 4 ]. Important metrics used to gauge the effectiveness of value-based care approaches include minimizing hospital length of stay, optimizing discharge disposition, and reducing costs [ 5 , 6 ]. While statistical models that predict these value-based outcomes have been developed within various medical specialties, there is a lack of generalizability of these models for practical use in the metastatic brain tumor population [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preoperative risk management programs were implemented to intervene in modifiable risk factors that can be addressed preoperatively to reduce the likelihood of complications like surgical site infections and prosthetic joint infections, readmissions, long LOS, and reoperation as well as reduced costs [7, 12, 19, 24, 25, 29, 41, 51, 54, 56-58]. These programs focus on managing modifiable risk factors such as obesity, malnutrition, diabetes, anemia, smoking, and substance use and make recommendations or referrals for managing these factors preoperatively.…”
Section: What We (Think) We Knowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Ryan et al [56] found that only 34% of patients for whom a referral for preoperative treatment was recommended for weight loss, anemia, smoking cessation, pain management, hematology, endocrinology, or cardiology received a referral to the appropriate specialist. The remaining 11 studies we found related to preoperative risk management programs (Table 2) did not attempt to measure the success of their referrals to outside specialists [7,12,19,24,25,29,41,51,54,57,58]. Without well-established referral pathways and nurse navigation, preoperative risk management becomes a barrier to TJA, and fails to provide the necessary resources for patients from racial or ethnic minority backgrounds and patients with lower incomes to reach preoperative guideline thresholds.…”
Section: What We (Think) We Knowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…BM patients face a high cost of care due to multi-modality treatments [1,3,4] with added prognostic uncertainties with signi cant morbidity and mortality [5]. Accurately predicting patients at high risk for a prolonged length of stay (LOS) and poor discharge dispositions after surgery may inform upfront surgical decision-making and optimize care centered around patient's preferences and healthcare resource utilization [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%