Value-Based Assessment of Radiology Reporting Using Radiologist-Referring Physician Two-Way Feedback System—a Design Thinking-Based Approach

Abstract

In the era of value-based healthcare, many aspects of medical care are being measured and assessed to improve quality and reduce costs. Radiology adds enormously to health care costs and is under pressure to adopt a more efficient system that incorporates essential metrics to assess its value and impact on outcomes. Most current systems tie radiologists' incentives and evaluations to RVU-based productivity metrics and peer-review-based quality metrics. In a new potential model, a radiologist's performance will have to increasingly depend on a number of parameters that define "value," beginning with peer review metrics that include referrer satisfaction and feedback from radiologists to the referring physician that evaluates the potency and validity of clinical information provided for a given study. These new dimensions of value measurement will directly impact the cascade of further medical management. We share our continued experience with this project that had two components: RESP (Referrer Evaluation System Pilot) and FRACI (Feedback from Radiologist Addressing Confounding Issues), which were introduced to the clinical radiology workflow in order to capture referrer-based and radiologist-based feedback on radiology reporting. We also share our insight into the principles of design thinking as applied in its planning and execution.

VR/AR Technology in Human Anatomy Teaching and Operation Training

“…The anatomical structure of orthopedics is complex, and it is difficult to convert a 2D image into a 3D model with only spatial imagination [ 6 ]. Shaikh et al used AR/VR technology to build a 3D visual surgery education model, convert patient image data into holographic images, and import them into VR equipment, where teachers and students wear HoloLens at the same time [ 7 ]. Eladl et al asked 16 surgeons to complete a series of actions such as standard nail transfer in the traditional CT-guided and VR-assisted laparoscopic trainer and found that the operation time, accuracy, and stability of the VR-assisted group were better than those of the CT-guided group, and the more complex the operation, the greater the difference of results [ 8 ].…”

Value-Based Healthcare and Radiology: How can Value be Measured?

“…In this context, and taking into account the opinions expressed by an interviewee from Group D and an interviewee from Group B, the metric ‘percentage of cases in which the consultation between the radiologist and the requesting doctor has an impact on the elaboration or alteration’ was reformulated, and it was considered relevant to add the metric. These metrics referring to the impact of the report are considered as an intermediate outcome, possibly measurable through a feedback system aimed at requesting physicians (Shaikh et al, 2017).…”

Multispecialty Enterprise Imaging Workgroup Consensus on Interactive Multimedia Reporting Current State and Road to the Future: HIMSS-SIIM Collaborative White Paper

“…Some sites have tested "patient friendly," educational report descriptions of significant findings launched out of hyperlinks [62]. Hyperlinks also can launch quality improvement feedback mechanisms for downstream physicians [63][64][65].…”