2008
DOI: 10.1504/ijram.2008.019312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value-at-risk: is lacking in sub-additivity just an annoying technicality?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Among the articles concerned with Pillar I (almost 49%), the subcategory "Estimation" received the most attention. Articles within this subcategory develop various models to measure regulatory capital against operational risk (see, e.g., [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]). The second largest topic (with 79 articles) is the "Application" of different models on the systematically collected internal or external operational loss databases (see, for instance, [5,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]).…”
Section: Pillar Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Among the articles concerned with Pillar I (almost 49%), the subcategory "Estimation" received the most attention. Articles within this subcategory develop various models to measure regulatory capital against operational risk (see, e.g., [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]). The second largest topic (with 79 articles) is the "Application" of different models on the systematically collected internal or external operational loss databases (see, for instance, [5,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]).…”
Section: Pillar Imentioning
confidence: 99%