2018
DOI: 10.1111/mafi.12192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value‐at‐Risk bounds with two‐sided dependence information

Abstract: Value‐at‐Risk (VaR) bounds for aggregated risks have been derived in the literature in settings where, besides the marginal distributions of the individual risk factors, one‐sided bounds for the joint distribution or the copula of the risks are available. In applications, it turns out that these improved standard bounds on VaR tend to be too wide to be relevant for practical applications, especially when the number of risk factors is large or when the dependence restriction is not strong enough. In this paper,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then various models of portfolio management balancing return and risk have been proposed, such as mean-semivariance model (Markovitz, 1959), mean-absolute deviation model (Konno & Yamazaki, 1991), value-at-risk model (Jorion, 1996), mean-risk curve model (Huang, 2008), mean-semivariance-CVaR model (Najafi & Mushakhian, 2015), etc. These models have been widely used and extended (Estrada, 2007;Wei, 2018;Lux & Rüschendorf, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then various models of portfolio management balancing return and risk have been proposed, such as mean-semivariance model (Markovitz, 1959), mean-absolute deviation model (Konno & Yamazaki, 1991), value-at-risk model (Jorion, 1996), mean-risk curve model (Huang, 2008), mean-semivariance-CVaR model (Najafi & Mushakhian, 2015), etc. These models have been widely used and extended (Estrada, 2007;Wei, 2018;Lux & Rüschendorf, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the upper bound on a distortion risk measure is always at least as large as its value under the assumption of a comonotonic dependence, a situation that is arguably very extreme. Papers that study bounds with additional dependence constraints or by imposing modeling structures include Bernard et al (2017), Lux and Rüschendorf (2019), and Wang et al (2019). Another stream of the literature is concerned with deriving risk bounds of the aggregate loss 𝑆 under partial knowledge of its moments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Papers that study bounds with additional dependence constraints or by imposing modeling structures include Bernard et al. (2017), Lux and Rüschendorf (2019), and Wang et al. (2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%