2012 International Conference on Statistics in Science, Business and Engineering (ICSSBE) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icssbe.2012.6396561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value-at-risk and conditional Value-at-risk estimation: A comparative study of risk performance for selected Malaysian sectoral indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li and Xia (2011) applied extreme value theory to an empirical analysis of VaR for the Chinese stock market, suggesting that extreme value theory can effectively assess tail risks in financial series under market volatility as it better captures the tail behaviour of distributions. Thim et al (2012) compared the risk performances of VaR and Conditional VaR (CVaR) for selected industry indices in Malaysia and found that the technology sector had the highest risk, whereas the consumer goods sector had the lowest. Jiang et al (2015) proposed a model aimed at minimising VaR to describe and quantify project delay risks and demonstrated the effectiveness of this approach in measuring delay risks through comparison with Monte Carlo simulations.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li and Xia (2011) applied extreme value theory to an empirical analysis of VaR for the Chinese stock market, suggesting that extreme value theory can effectively assess tail risks in financial series under market volatility as it better captures the tail behaviour of distributions. Thim et al (2012) compared the risk performances of VaR and Conditional VaR (CVaR) for selected industry indices in Malaysia and found that the technology sector had the highest risk, whereas the consumer goods sector had the lowest. Jiang et al (2015) proposed a model aimed at minimising VaR to describe and quantify project delay risks and demonstrated the effectiveness of this approach in measuring delay risks through comparison with Monte Carlo simulations.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though, the histogram and the statistics provide comparative information about the behavior of the model and the loss rate prediction, Value at Risk (VaR) analysis could provide more deep analysis based on some confidence [33]. The Monte Carlo simulation model considered as one of the three common types of VaR.…”
Section: Value At Risk (Var) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research and for better generalizability, the chosen confidence level was 95%, since outlier results would appear with a more significant percentage, especially for Hedera and ECMP. Note that we calculated the probability of the confidence level by considering the quantile function, as in equation 11 [33].…”
Section: Value At Risk (Var) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artzner et al (1999) not only showed the incoherence of VaR but also introduced the Conditional Value at Risk and called it a perfect risk measure, in his paper "Coherent Measures of Risk". In 2000, Pflug (2000) proved that CVaR is a coherent risk measure, based on the coherent risk measure theory (Artzner et al 1999;Thim et al 2012). Furthermore, Du and Escanciano (2016) showed that the advantages of Conditional Value at Risk over VaR are not only theoretical but also have empirical manifestations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%