2000
DOI: 10.1080/000368400421075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value added in further education and vocational training in Northern Ireland

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly,Armstrong and McVicar (2000) find that there is strong relationship between initial general education and subsequent success in vocational training.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Interestingly,Armstrong and McVicar (2000) find that there is strong relationship between initial general education and subsequent success in vocational training.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…To form this jointly determined process of both equations' outcomes, the bivariate semi-ordered probit model is employed. 26,28 In the first step, the correlation coefficient ρ is estimated, and then the hypothesis that ρ equals zero is tested. If the aforementioned hypothesis is not verified (ρ≠0), the antismoking policy support outcome must be jointly determined with the smoking participation decision in order to sidestep a biased estimate of the smoking status parameter.…”
Section: Psychosocial Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore we cost switches between these three states cheaply, so that a sequence of school for 2 years and then HE is categorized as similar to a sequence of FE for 2 years and then HE. However, level 2 qualifications are far more common outcomes for those young people who have been in training schemes (see Armstrong and McVicar (2000) for details). Therefore we place a high cost on switching between school, HE and training.…”
Section: Optimal Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%