2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02359-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuation of Treatments for Rare Diseases: A Systematic Literature Review of Societal Preference Studies

Abstract: Introduction:We sought to synthesize published empirical studies that elicited and characterized societal valuations of orphan drugs and the attributes that may drive different valuations for orphan drugs versus other treatments. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases up to November 2, 2020. Search terms covered societal preferences and attributes of orphan drugs (e.g., disease prevalence, severity, burden, unmet needs, and benefits). Results: We identified 3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of disease severity was deemed more important for decision makers by the Expert panel than the implications of rarity and should be formally and consistently accounted for in future vaccine HTA/CEA. This is supported by a recent systematic review showing a societal preference for investing in rare diseases, which was driven by the disease severity, lack of alternative options, and a desire to be able to treat all people [ 24 ]. Recently, the UK’s HTA guidelines, from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), have been updated to allow greater weight in CEA for health benefits in severe diseases (replacing greater weight for end-of-life health gains), as well as allowing more flexibility with regard to uncertainty when generation of supporting evidence is challenging, such as for rare diseases [ 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The impact of disease severity was deemed more important for decision makers by the Expert panel than the implications of rarity and should be formally and consistently accounted for in future vaccine HTA/CEA. This is supported by a recent systematic review showing a societal preference for investing in rare diseases, which was driven by the disease severity, lack of alternative options, and a desire to be able to treat all people [ 24 ]. Recently, the UK’s HTA guidelines, from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), have been updated to allow greater weight in CEA for health benefits in severe diseases (replacing greater weight for end-of-life health gains), as well as allowing more flexibility with regard to uncertainty when generation of supporting evidence is challenging, such as for rare diseases [ 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These treatments are often expensive, and insurance companies or public health agencies must estimate the treatment cost before making it available, which is impossible without accurate incidence data. 9 Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has generated a large amount of genomic data from patients and normal populations. These data provide an excellent opportunity to directly estimate disease incidences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New treatments for rare diseases have recently emerged. These treatments are often expensive, and insurance companies or public health agencies must estimate the treatment cost before making it available, which is impossible without accurate incidence data 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%