2021
DOI: 10.2478/rmzmag-2021-0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuation of Rubber Waste and Dune Sand: mortar for construction and environmental protection

Abstract: The main objective of this study is the recovery of dune sands and rubber waste (powders). The latter constitutes a potential source of several environmental and economic problems. The objective of this present work is to examine the ability to use dune sand for the preparation of mortars with sufficient physico-mechanical properties to allow them to be used in various building construction applications. The formulation of the mixtures is based on replacing dune sand with powders, at different w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At 20°C, the absorption by total immersion decreases by about 18.92%, 19.25% for mortars respectively with (10%, 20%) RP substitution compared to control mortar, in accordance with the findings of several authors for the incorporation of rubber aggregates in cementitious matrices and the zero absorption of rubbers [20,21] cited by [22]. This is surely due to the probable decrease in the porosity of these mortars [23]. On the other hand, there was a return in the decrease in absorption of the order of 7.18% for the mortar with 30% RP substitution, differently to the result found by [22] for this percentage of substitutions.…”
Section: Absorption By Total Immersionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…At 20°C, the absorption by total immersion decreases by about 18.92%, 19.25% for mortars respectively with (10%, 20%) RP substitution compared to control mortar, in accordance with the findings of several authors for the incorporation of rubber aggregates in cementitious matrices and the zero absorption of rubbers [20,21] cited by [22]. This is surely due to the probable decrease in the porosity of these mortars [23]. On the other hand, there was a return in the decrease in absorption of the order of 7.18% for the mortar with 30% RP substitution, differently to the result found by [22] for this percentage of substitutions.…”
Section: Absorption By Total Immersionsupporting
confidence: 90%