2006
DOI: 10.3386/w12020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuation in Over-the-Counter Markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
251
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(260 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(56 reference statements)
9
251
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with microstructure models that predict a positive relation between the number of potential investors and liquidity in over-the-counter markets (e.g. Duffie et al, 2005Duffie et al, , 2007. Furthermore, the liquidity advantage of global bonds is priced, and can explain the tendency of large corporations to issue global rather than domestic bonds.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These findings are consistent with microstructure models that predict a positive relation between the number of potential investors and liquidity in over-the-counter markets (e.g. Duffie et al, 2005Duffie et al, , 2007. Furthermore, the liquidity advantage of global bonds is priced, and can explain the tendency of large corporations to issue global rather than domestic bonds.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Duffie et al (2005Duffie et al ( , 2007 develop a model in which transactions costs and liquidity in over-the-counter markets, such as the corporate bond market, depend on the number of potential investors. Their model predicts that illiquidity discounts are smaller if the number of qualified investors is greater, and investors have access to multiple dealers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, in terms of impact channels, we find that the relatively large effects from SMP purchases can be explained in terms of reduced liquidity risk premia, default risk signaling effects, and possibly local supply effects in segmented markets (see Duffie, Garleanu, andPedersen, 2005, 2007;and De Pooter, Martin, and Pruitt, 2013). Firstly, the flow of purchases from an investor of last resort reduces liquidity risk premia by making a counterparty easier to find.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition to the above-cited references, important contributions include Amihud and Mendelson (1986), Lippman and McCall (1986), Grossman and Miller (1988), Grossman and Laroque (1990), Boudoukh and Whitelaw (1993), Holmstrom and Tirole (2001), Huang (2003), Kahl et al (2003), O'Hara (2003), Eisfeldt (2004), Duffie et al (2005Duffie et al ( , 2008, Cetin et al (2006), Acharya and Pederson (2005), Vayanos and Wang (2007), Brunnermeier andPederson (2009), Longstaff (2009), and many others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%