The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11157-020-09531-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valorization of digestates from urban or centralized biogas plants: a critical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 222 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, comparing food wastes and maize silage, food wastes are already processed goods with a high degradability and high protein content. Thereby, food waste-based digestates tend to have a higher OM degradability and a higher share of NH + 4 -N than maize silage, that could enhance soil microbial activity (Möller and Müller, 2012;Guilayn et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, comparing food wastes and maize silage, food wastes are already processed goods with a high degradability and high protein content. Thereby, food waste-based digestates tend to have a higher OM degradability and a higher share of NH + 4 -N than maize silage, that could enhance soil microbial activity (Möller and Müller, 2012;Guilayn et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…smart recycle bin (Yeo et al, 2019), under-the-sink FLW disposal connecting to the sewer system (Cecchi and Cavinato, 2019), pipeline transmission (Muradin et al, 2018) -Technology: further R&D into optimal feedstock, and optimal process design and conditions is needed to cope with the low-yield issue and maximise output of targeted products (Elkhalifa et al, 2019) -Supply: supply locations are geographically dispersed (Kokossis and Koutinas, 2012); FLW feedstock bears regional and seasonal traits (Caruso et al, 2019); source segregation is required (Cecchi and Cavinato, 2019). -Market: the demand for fertilisers always exceeds supply (Chojnacka et al, 2020); consumer preferences towards foods produced from the upcycled and ecofriendly materials enhance the intrinsic value of digestate used as recycled fertilisers/ compost (Guilayn et al, 2020) -Technology: this technology has a small production scale compared to fossil-based fertiliser production (Chojnacka et al, 2020), encounters difficulty in planning and use, causes unpleasant odour for neighbourhood (Case et al, 2017); there is limited knowledge regarding vermicomposting (Choudhary and Suri, 2018).…”
Section: J O U R N a L P R E -P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Logistics: high collection and handling costs (Sakarika et al, 2019) -Policy: the legal status of digestate that varies in different countries hinders its use (Stiles et al, 2018;Beggio et al, 2019;Chojnacka et al, 2020); and no specific quality control and criteria available for using digestates as fertilisers (Guilayn et al, 2020).…”
Section: J O U R N a L P R E -P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, new technologies for processing liquid fractions of digestates are still being explored [17]. One of the possibilities is through nutrient recovery such as struvite (STR) precipitation [18] and ammonia stripping (to produce ammonium sulphate (AS)) [6,[19][20][21], combined ozone treatment and ultrafiltration [22], combined system with aerobic granular sludge batch reactors and ultrafiltration [23], or utilizing fly ash as a chemical precipitant [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appropriate post-treatments for either solid fractions or liquid fractions of digestates are very crucial for any future biogas plant that integrates part of the circular bioeconomy [17,29,30]. The aim of the circular economy is to influence material and energy flows in order to maximize environmental benefits whilst avoiding costs (grow-makese-restore) [31]; which is currently one of the main priorities of the European Union as described in detail by Molina-Moreno et al [32], Muradin et al [33] and Vilardi et al [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%