2019
DOI: 10.2478/cee-2019-0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valorization of Crushed Glass as a Potential Replacement for Sand in Cement Stabilized Fly Ash Bricks

Abstract: The present study involved the utilization of crushed glass as an auxiliary additive in the manufacture of cement stabilized fly ash (CSF) bricks. The bricks were made with 1:1 proportion of fly ash and sand stabilized with 20 % cement. Crushed glass was used as replacement for the fine aggregate in increments of 10 % up to 40 % wherein the sand was completely replaced with crushed glass. The various mix proportions were then moulded into bricks with the addition of water by hand moulding method of forming the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…use of combinations of lime and ESA in soil stabilization. To bring in the effect of the combination of lime and ESA, the two additives were reduced to a ratio as done in some earlier investigations ( [18], [27]). However, pure lime and pure ESA combinations have not been included in the comparison.…”
Section: Figure 1 the Effect Of Lime And Esa On The Ucs Of The Stabilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…use of combinations of lime and ESA in soil stabilization. To bring in the effect of the combination of lime and ESA, the two additives were reduced to a ratio as done in some earlier investigations ( [18], [27]). However, pure lime and pure ESA combinations have not been included in the comparison.…”
Section: Figure 1 the Effect Of Lime And Esa On The Ucs Of The Stabilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…" # " # " # " # (Pegoretti, et al, 2002) Ceramic Based Products " # X " # " # (Gol, et al, 2021) Burnt Bricks " # " # " # " # (Saraswathy, et al, 2019) Insulation " # " # " # " # (Shafi et al, 2019) The other reusing option which failed to satisfy one of the primary functions was ceramicbased products. This is mainly due to the poor shock resistance, weak in tension and may crack when hit with heavy items (TheKacasSite, 2021).…”
Section: Figure 2: Breakdown Of Papers According To Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers, in developing brick function, used waste materials. They used crumb rubber-concrete combination (Turgut and Yesilata, 2008); waste marble powder (Bilgin et al, 2012); sludge lime (Hasan et al, 2022); rice husk (Paul et al, 2023); granite fines waste (Lokeshwari and Jagadish, 2016); paper mill sludge (Goel and Kalamdhad, 2017); quarry dust (Cai et al, 2023); construction debris (Harikumar et al, 2022); steel plant waste (Chokshi et al, 2018); coal fly ash (Eliche-Quesada et al, 2018); crushed glass (Saraswathy et al, 2019); blast furnace slag (Nim and Meshram, 2020); demolition waste sludge (Dos Reis et al, 2020); straw (Dawood et al, 2021); waste plastic (Wendimu et al, 2021); ceramic powders (Khitab et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%