2007
DOI: 10.1007/bf03320930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valor umbral del coste por año de vida ganado para recomendar la adopción de tecnologías sanitarias en España: evidencias procedentes de una revisión de la literatura

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
30
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…With €30,000/QALY [37] or €30,000/QALY-€45,000/QALY [38] being the threshold for determining whether a health technology is cost-effective, we have determined that MRF service for older adults with polypharmacy in community pharmacies is costeffective compared with usual dispensing. We estimated that MRF service was a dominant intervention (less costly and more effective than usual dispensing) and the acceptability curve showed that there was little uncertainty, due to the fact that 100% of the bootstrap simulations were below €30,000/QALY and €45,000/QALY.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With €30,000/QALY [37] or €30,000/QALY-€45,000/QALY [38] being the threshold for determining whether a health technology is cost-effective, we have determined that MRF service for older adults with polypharmacy in community pharmacies is costeffective compared with usual dispensing. We estimated that MRF service was a dominant intervention (less costly and more effective than usual dispensing) and the acceptability curve showed that there was little uncertainty, due to the fact that 100% of the bootstrap simulations were below €30,000/QALY and €45,000/QALY.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cost per QALY of €30,000 is the threshold commonly accepted to be affordable by society and the health-care system, although without official recognition in Spain [16]. It has been pointed out that an important disadvantage for making recommendations on thresholds for investing in health-care interventions based on literature reviews is the disparity, uncertainty, and arbitrariness of the criteria applied by authors with which to draw conclusions [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estos estudios emplearon ambas perspectivas descritas, aunque la mayoría se centraban en estimar el valor social de las ganancias en salud [25][26][27][28][29] y únicamente un trabajo 30 estimó el coste por AV en el sistema español. Otros dos estudios se basaron en una revisión de evaluaciones económicas 16,31 . La tabla 1 recoge las estimaciones del umbral CE para España contenidas en la revisión de la literatura.…”
Section: No Es País Para Umbrales ¿O Sí? El Caso De Españaunclassified
“…A pesar de disponer de estimaciones del umbral CE en España 16,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31] , ninguna de las cifras disponibles es formalmente reconocida en la toma de decisiones. El panel de expertos mostró un consenso general sobre la necesidad de fijar un umbral explícito para España.…”
Section: Líneas De Avanceunclassified