2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-1196-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation

Abstract: The EQ-Index has shown reasonable concurrent validity, limited predictive validity, and acceptable responsiveness for detecting the health-related quality of life in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation, but not for EQ-VAS. Future research considering different recovery stages after stroke is warranted to validate these estimations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
101
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
101
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, being exposed to a DBI medication and a PIM was associated with a decrease of 0.034 DEMQOL-SelfReport-Utility score compared to not being exposed to a DBI medication or PIM. The precise clinically meaningful difference in the quality of life scores used in this study population remains unclear, but previous literature has suggested a clinically meaningful difference in such utility measures may be in the range of 0.03 to 0.10 depending on the population being studied [22][23][24]. This would suggest that many of the associations seen in this study between the number of PIMs a participant was exposed to and quality of life utility measures may not be clinically meaningful (between 0.020 and 0.030 difference in quality of life with exposure to an additional PIM); however, the cumulative impact of multiple PIMs may be clinically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, being exposed to a DBI medication and a PIM was associated with a decrease of 0.034 DEMQOL-SelfReport-Utility score compared to not being exposed to a DBI medication or PIM. The precise clinically meaningful difference in the quality of life scores used in this study population remains unclear, but previous literature has suggested a clinically meaningful difference in such utility measures may be in the range of 0.03 to 0.10 depending on the population being studied [22][23][24]. This would suggest that many of the associations seen in this study between the number of PIMs a participant was exposed to and quality of life utility measures may not be clinically meaningful (between 0.020 and 0.030 difference in quality of life with exposure to an additional PIM); however, the cumulative impact of multiple PIMs may be clinically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is no consensus, changes in the EQ-5D utility index and WEMWBS of 0.10 [24] and between 3 and 8 points [25], respectively, have been recommended as clinically important. In this trial, we observed that scores on these questionnaires were, on average, 0.12 and 6 points higher, respectively, in the Yoga group at 3 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, MFS improvement patterns paralleled those of X A , and strong correlations were demonstrated between active function and composite active motion at each visit. Yet, these functional improvements were paralleled by positive but small changes in SF-36 and EQ-5D scores, 44,45 which could suggest functional upper limb changes of a greater magnitude may be needed for a meaningful impact on quality of life or perceived health scores. Overall, the results of the present study seem more positive than those obtained by Shaw et al or Lagalla et al, 19,20 which may be due to a number of factors, including the electrical stimulation localization method systematically used to target muscles in our study, overall doses injected, and the outcome measures used.…”
Section: Improvement Of Perceived and Active Function Acrossmentioning
confidence: 99%