1987
DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(87)90190-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity requirements for fracture toughness measurements obtained from small circumferentially notched cylindrical specimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the data retrieved by photography is mostly qualitative and suffers from a lens-flare around the notch, a greyscale profile curve taken across the X-axis suggests that the radius of the concentrated zone varies between 2 and 4 mm. The size of the concentrated zone, indicated on the photograph, is essential to the validity of the compact-tension test, as a large concentrated area implies that the singularity-dominated zone has effectively uniform volume fraction [13,35]. The K IC calculation [Equation 4] assumes plane strain conditions near the crack-tip [34], which require the concentrated zone to be larger than the radius of plasticity, where the matrix reaches its yield point (r p ≈ 30 µm).…”
Section: Magnetic Translation and Rotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the data retrieved by photography is mostly qualitative and suffers from a lens-flare around the notch, a greyscale profile curve taken across the X-axis suggests that the radius of the concentrated zone varies between 2 and 4 mm. The size of the concentrated zone, indicated on the photograph, is essential to the validity of the compact-tension test, as a large concentrated area implies that the singularity-dominated zone has effectively uniform volume fraction [13,35]. The K IC calculation [Equation 4] assumes plane strain conditions near the crack-tip [34], which require the concentrated zone to be larger than the radius of plasticity, where the matrix reaches its yield point (r p ≈ 30 µm).…”
Section: Magnetic Translation and Rotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orientation factor η θ is a function of the angle θ between the fibers and the X-axis; it varies between 0 (θ = 90 • ) and 1 (θ = 0 • ). As fiber alignment causes G c and E enhancement [12,18,25,[34][35][36], it directly affects fracture toughness. For the elastic modulus E, the orientation factor decreases with orientation angle as described by the Krenchel factor-cos 4 (θ) [37].…”
Section: Mechanical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the case of axisymmetrical cracked bars has already been addressed using finite element analysis (e.g. Ibrahim andStark 1987, Pardoen et al 2000), it may not be close to that of the UXT geometry in spite of all precautions that were taken to stiffen the specimen. In the present experimental study, a simpler plane strain approximation was taken.…”
Section: Assessment Of Small Scale Yielding Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rapid, cost effective and reliable technique for fracture toughness evaluation requiring easy to machine specimen type has been proposed with the use of circumferential notch tensile specimens. The advantage of the CNT specimens for fracture toughness evaluation include: 1) attainment of plain strain crack loading conditions with smaller specimen dimension in comparison with the CT specimen 10 ; 2) radial symmetry which makes them suitable for studying the impact of the microstructure on fracture toughness 9 ; 3) ease of machining to desired test configuration 12 ; and 4) ease of testing using simple testing facilities like the tensometer 9 . The advantages make the use of CNT specimens very attractive for fracture toughness evaluation especially in developing African countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%