1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00609413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of the Wescor's sweat conductivity analyzer for the assessment of sweat electrolyte concentrations

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to compare the "NaCl equivalent" values determined by the Wescor's sweat conductivity analyzer (Sweat-Chek) with the sweat Na+ and Cl- concentration values measured by conventional methods. The sweat was induced by 60-min exercise and collected by a closed-pouch collector. The "NaCl equivalent" values determined by the sweat conductivity analyzer (mean: 75 mmol.L-1, range: 38 - 122, n = 72) were significantly (P < 0.05) greater than Na+ concentration values (mean: 71 mmol.L-1, ran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, these methods only facilitate measurement of skin surface electrolyte concentration at a given time. The amount of sweat electrolytes can also be estimated by measurement of the sweat electrical conductivity (Boisvert and Candas 1994;Heeley et al 2000;Webster and Quirante 2000). However, these methods for measuring sweat conductivity have limitations at very low levels (at the onset) of sweat and for long periods of continuous measurement, because they are used to collect sweat for particular periods (>10 min) and they sometimes fail to allow for low concentration or insufficient volumes of sweat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, these methods only facilitate measurement of skin surface electrolyte concentration at a given time. The amount of sweat electrolytes can also be estimated by measurement of the sweat electrical conductivity (Boisvert and Candas 1994;Heeley et al 2000;Webster and Quirante 2000). However, these methods for measuring sweat conductivity have limitations at very low levels (at the onset) of sweat and for long periods of continuous measurement, because they are used to collect sweat for particular periods (>10 min) and they sometimes fail to allow for low concentration or insufficient volumes of sweat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test this, we measured the index of sweat ion concentration by a new method (Shamsuddin and Togawa 1998) that is advantageous because it overcomes some of the aforementioned limitations of the earlier methods (Boisvert and Candas 1994;Heeley et al 2000;Webster and Quirante 2000) and can be used over long periods of time to obtain continuous measurement with differing sweat rates. Also, it can test the possibility that the ion reabsorption capacity could be detected continuously by using the relationship between sweat rate and sweat conductivity that may reflect the sweat ion concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination of sweat composition using a closed-pouch sweat collector (Brisson et al 1991) has been validated against other local sweat collection (Boisvert and Candas 1994) and whole-body wash-down techniques (Patterson et al 2000); however, the reproducibility of this technique has not yet been established. Shirreffs and Maughan (1997) established the reproducibility of a whole-body wash-down technique for determination of sweat composition; however the reported coefficients of variation were high (15-23%) and were likely to be related to differences in sweat rate between trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both are largely confined to screening in clinical applications and are not approved by the CFF. Wescor's sweat conductivity analyzer is one such technique of note 26 . Sweat was induced by 60 minutes of exercise and collected by closed-pouch collector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%