2019
DOI: 10.3995/jstroke.10734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of the remote evaluation of NIH Stroke Scale, modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index using a tablet device (iPad<sup>®</sup>).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant correlations between the BI score with measurements of GDS-15, SWLS, and VAS supported the BI's criterion-related validity with was reported in most previous validity studies. 30,31 The BI had a satisfactory internal consistency coefficient of 0.903, which was generally consistent with that reported in previous studies ranging from 0.69 32 to 0.96. 33 The dimensionality of The mean item-total correlation of the Barthel Index.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Significant correlations between the BI score with measurements of GDS-15, SWLS, and VAS supported the BI's criterion-related validity with was reported in most previous validity studies. 30,31 The BI had a satisfactory internal consistency coefficient of 0.903, which was generally consistent with that reported in previous studies ranging from 0.69 32 to 0.96. 33 The dimensionality of The mean item-total correlation of the Barthel Index.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We observed significant variances of the participants' ADL score across age, gender, education and health status subgroups, which confirmed the known‐group validity of the BI. Significant correlations between the BI score with measurements of GDS‐15, SWLS, and VAS supported the BI's criterion‐related validity with was reported in most previous validity studies 30,31 . The BI had a satisfactory internal consistency coefficient of 0.903, which was generally consistent with that reported in previous studies ranging from 0.69 32 to 0.96 33 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…There are concerns regarding the possibility of determining the NIHSS score through telemedicine consultations within an appropriate time. Isahaya et al reported that there was no difference in the accuracy of evaluating the NIHSS score regardless of whether a video transmission system was used or if a “face-to-face” examination of the patient was performed 14 ) . Another concern is the potential difference in the therapeutic effect and the rate of complications between a general physician administering rt-PA therapy with telemedicine support and a specialist infusing it at a stroke center.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further thought that enabling real‐time discussions using a videophone system was essential for the general physicians to be able to consult with a specialist face‐to‐face. Furthermore, Isahaya et al 13 reported that there was no difference in the accuracy of evaluating the NIHSS score whether using a video transmission system or face‐to‐face with the patient. Taken together, a telemedicine device with a thin client viewer system plus videophone was a useful and practical tool for stroke telemedicine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%