2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of the Posterior-Anterior Middle Cervical Spine Gliding Test for the Examination of Intervertebral Joint Hypomobility in Mechanical Neck Pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Segmental mobility was rated as normal, hypomobile, or hypermobile. 35,38 Rehabilitation Program for the COM Group The rehabilitation program for the COM group consisted of cervical and thoracic mobilizations, as well as stabilization and mobility exercises. This program was based on current clinical practice 7 and on programs developed in 2 RCTs evaluating participants with neck and upper-limb pain that did not include any specific techniques thought to increase the size of the IVF.…”
Section: Rehabilitation Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Segmental mobility was rated as normal, hypomobile, or hypermobile. 35,38 Rehabilitation Program for the COM Group The rehabilitation program for the COM group consisted of cervical and thoracic mobilizations, as well as stabilization and mobility exercises. This program was based on current clinical practice 7 and on programs developed in 2 RCTs evaluating participants with neck and upper-limb pain that did not include any specific techniques thought to increase the size of the IVF.…”
Section: Rehabilitation Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Segmental mobility will be rated as normal, hypomobile or hypermobile. Sandmark & Nisell and Rey-Eiriz et al demonstrated that this rating of cervicothoracic mobility is sensitive (> 0.80) and specific (> 0.70) [44,45]. Furthermore, this evaluation of segmental mobility is recommended in the Neck Pain Clinical Practice Guide of the American Physical Therapist Association [5].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34,35 Validation of such an assessment procedure is to be found elsewhere for symptomatic subjects. 36,37 The number of HVLA manipulations depended on the number of mobility restrictions found by the practitioner to be consistent with clinical practice. 38 …”
Section: Study Design and Samplementioning
confidence: 97%