Validity of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-Revised: A replication in an outpatient sample

Hyler, Steven E.; Skodol, Andrew E.; Oldham, John M.; Kellman, H D; Doidge, Norman

doi:10.1016/0010-440x(92)90001-7

Cited by 238 publications

(158 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

149

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although a number of interviews or self-rated questionnaires are also used for PD screening, the number of interviews specifically designed for PD screening is limited: the Personality Assessment ScheduleRapid version (PAS-R) (30 items, 10 minutes to complete) [15] and the Standardized Assessment of Personality -Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS) (8 items, 5 minutes to complete) [16]. Most screening measures are based on the use of self-rated questionnaires, e.g., the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire (PDQ 4+) (99 items, 20 minutes to complete) [17][18][19][20], the DSM-IV and ICQ-10 Personality Questionnaire (DIP-Q) (140 items, 20 minutes to complete) [21,22], the SCID-II Screen (115 items, 20 minutes to complete) [12], the IPDEQ (screen) from the IPDE (DSM-IV version 77 items, ICD-10 version : 59 items, 20 minutes to complete) [14]; the Personality Assessment Screener (PAS) (22 items, 5 minutes to complete) [23,24]; The Personality Disorder Screening (PDS) (12 items, 5 minutes to complete) [25]; the Iowa Personality Disorder Screen (IPDS) (11 items, 5 minutes to complete) [26][27][28]; the Personality Disorder Screening -Short Version (PSS-K) (8 items, 5 minutes to complete) [29]; and the Standardized Assessment of Personality -Abbreviated Scale Self-Report (SAPAS-SR) (8 items, 5 minutes to complete) [30].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adaptation and Validation of the Standardized Assessment of Personality – Abbreviated Scale as a Self-Administered Screening Test (SA-SAPAS)

Merlhiot¹

2014

J Psychol Psychother

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Personality disorder assessments are time-intensive and require trained interviewers. They are unlikely to be performed on a routine basis. In clinical and general populations, there is a requirement for short and robust self-administered screening tests for personality disorders. We first translated the original form of the SAPAS into French and validated it in a clinical sample (n=28). This adaptation revealed properties similar to those of the original version. The first and second studies validated the adaptation of the SA-SAPAS as a self-administered questionnaire in clinical (n=45) and general (n=186) populations. We were able to use the same cut-off (score ≥ 2) in both the clinical and general populations and this permitted correct identification in 89% of the clinical subjects (sensitivity of 97.3%; specificity of 50%) and 86% in the general population (sensitivity of 87.5%; specificity of 85.7%). These results suggest possible applications for researchers and clinicians, either as a routine screening test or as a selection tool in both general and clinical populations.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adaptation and Validation of the Standardized Assessment of Personality – Abbreviated Scale as a Self-Administered Screening Test (SA-SAPAS)

Merlhiot¹

2014

J Psychol Psychother

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Self-report methods generally yield higher diagnostic base rates (Hunt & Andrews, 1992;Hyler, Skodol, Oldham, Kellman, & Rosnick, 1990;Hyler et al, 1992). The discrepancy between these methods is typically attributed to the tendency of questionnaires to "overdiagnose" (McDermutt & Zimmerman, 2005); hence the recommendation that self-report instruments "may be useful as screening measures but are inappropriate for use in making diagnoses" (McDermutt & Zimmerman, 2005, p. 99).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparison of interview and self-report methods for the assessment of borderline personality disorder criteria.

Hopwood¹,

Morey²,

Edelen³

et al. 2008

Psychological Assessment

Self Cite

104

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Trull, Goodwin, Schopp, Hillenbrand and Schuster (1993), obtained the psychometric properties from an early version of PBQ, which was applied to university students examining inter-correlations between the scales, as well as the correlations between the scales and other personality disorder measurements, finding an adequate evidence of reliability. The average correlation between the scales of PBQ was 0.40 and there was only a slight correlation between the PBQ and the revised questionnaire of personality disorders (Hyler et al, 1992) and the MMPI-PD (Morey, Waugh & Blashfield, 1985).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 87%

Psychometric properties and structural validity of the short version of the personality beliefs questionnaire (PBQ-SF)

Hernández¹,

Vásquez²

2015

Int. j. psychol. res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Article history: Received: 24-03-2015 Revised: 03-06-2015 Accepted: 30-06-2015 The Personality Belief Questionnaire-Short Form (PBQ-SF) is an assessment instrument of personality beliefs based on the cognitive theory that states that these are characterized by a specific pattern of dysfunctional thoughts. The objective of this study was to establish the psychometric properties and structural validity of the PBQ-SF questionnaire in Colombian adults from 18 to 35 years old. To carry out the above and with permission of the author the validation process was initiated following a thorough and rigorous process that led to a final version of the PBQ-SF applied to 1423 persons born in Colombia and living in nine Colombian cities. Analysis of internal consistency among the items (Cronbach´s alpha), confirmatory factor analysis and calculus of goodness of fit estimators were performed. It was found that the Internal consistency of the domains varied from 0,65 for avoidant disorder up to 0,83 for paranoid disorder. RESUMENEl Cuestionario de Creencias de Personalidad -Versión Corta (PBQ-SF) es un instrumento de evaluación de creencias de personalidad basado en la teoría cognitiva que sostiene que estas están caracterizadas por un patrón específico de pensamientos disfuncionales. El objetivo de este estudio fue establecer las propiedades psicométricas y la validez estructural del cuestionario PBQ-SF, en adultos colombianos de 18 a 35 años. Para llevar a cabo lo anterior y con previa autorización del autor se inició el proceso de validación el cual siguió un proceso completo y riguroso que derivó en una versión final del PBQ-SF aplicada en 1423 personas nacidas en Colombia y residentes en 9 ciudades colombianas; se realizaron análisis de consistencia interna entre los ítems (alfa de Cronbach), análisis factorial confirmatorio y cálculo de los estimadores de bondad de ajuste. Se encontró que la consistencia interna de los dominios varió desde 0,65 para el trastorno evitativo hasta 0,83 para el trastorno paranoide.

show abstract

Validity of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-Revised: A replication in an outpatient sample

Cited by 238 publications

References 3 publications

Adaptation and Validation of the Standardized Assessment of Personality – Abbreviated Scale as a Self-Administered Screening Test (SA-SAPAS)

Adaptation and Validation of the Standardized Assessment of Personality – Abbreviated Scale as a Self-Administered Screening Test (SA-SAPAS)

A comparison of interview and self-report methods for the assessment of borderline personality disorder criteria.

Psychometric properties and structural validity of the short version of the personality beliefs questionnaire (PBQ-SF)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About