2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00668.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of the Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale in a Heavy Drinking Population

Abstract: There was some support for the construct validity of the OCDS in this clinical group. Concurrent validity of the scale was not supported by these cross-sectional data. Future research should examine the predictive utility of the OCDS over time.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
28
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This AUDIT score is considerably higher than the mean score for rural and urban DUI offenders in Kentucky referred for assessment (7.4; Webster, Dickson, Duvall, & Clark, 2010) and for offenders convicted of multiple DUIs (14.5; Conley, 2001). In fact, the average AUDIT score in this study is consistent with other studies of individuals identified as alcohol-dependent entering outpatient treatment (Connor et al, 2008; Donovan, Kivlahan, Doyle, Longabaugh, & Greenfield, 2006) and psychiatric inpatient treatment (Bácskai, Czobor, & Gerevich, 2008). …”
Section: Profile Of Rural Alcohol Userssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This AUDIT score is considerably higher than the mean score for rural and urban DUI offenders in Kentucky referred for assessment (7.4; Webster, Dickson, Duvall, & Clark, 2010) and for offenders convicted of multiple DUIs (14.5; Conley, 2001). In fact, the average AUDIT score in this study is consistent with other studies of individuals identified as alcohol-dependent entering outpatient treatment (Connor et al, 2008; Donovan, Kivlahan, Doyle, Longabaugh, & Greenfield, 2006) and psychiatric inpatient treatment (Bácskai, Czobor, & Gerevich, 2008). …”
Section: Profile Of Rural Alcohol Userssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…2,3,11,12 The OCDS 13 is by far the most frequently utilized scale in this respect, but the predictive value of the OCDS over time is somewhat unclear, 24,31 and future research in this area has been suggested. 25 Previously, we demonstrated that the OCDS total score is predictive for 12-month follow-up after outpatient treatment for alcoholism, 30 especially in the "obsessions" and "control and consequences" subscales. Kranzler et al 23 also demonstrated that a higher OCDS score is predictive for outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…13,16 There are numerous, validated translations with good reliability and construct validity, [17][18][19] including a German one. 20 The studies examining the construct and concurrent and discriminant validity of the OCDS 13,16,[21][22][23][24] were discussed in depth by Connor et al 25 In addition, Connor et al 25 recently performed a further validation study in 370 patients and found that neither the factor scores nor the total OCDS score was related to baseline alcohol problems or consumption. In addition, they found some support for the construct validity of the OCDS, but did not find concurrent validity of the scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There are several validated translations with good reliability and construct validity, including a German version [6,28-31]. The studies that examined the construct, concurrent and discriminate validity of the OCDS [24,27,32-35] were reviewed by Connor et al [36], who also performed a further validation study and reported that neither the factor scores nor the total OCDS score was related to baseline alcohol problems or consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%