1995
DOI: 10.1177/1073191195002003002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) in Children with Traumatic Brain Injury

Abstract: The concurrent and construct validity of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) was evaluated in a sample of 47 children with traumatic brain injury (TBI). When K-BIT standard scores were compared to Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III) IQ scores, correlations ranged from .32 to .79, and standard errors of estimation ranged from 6.87 to 10.39. Correlations with length of coma were not statistically significant for any of the K-BIT indexes, whereas such correlations were statis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous findings regarding the selective sensitivity of the PO and PS factor index scores to general severity of THI (Donders, 1995(Donders, , 1997, Cluster 2 included the highest proportion of children with severe injuries, the highest proportion of CT/ MRI scans that were "positive" for diffuse lesions, and the longest length of coma, as compared to all other clusters. However, the distinct pattern of Cluster 2 cannot be explained exclusively by global level of injury severity because the majority of the children in this cluster also had CT/MRI scan evidence for focal right hemisphere lesions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with previous findings regarding the selective sensitivity of the PO and PS factor index scores to general severity of THI (Donders, 1995(Donders, , 1997, Cluster 2 included the highest proportion of children with severe injuries, the highest proportion of CT/ MRI scans that were "positive" for diffuse lesions, and the longest length of coma, as compared to all other clusters. However, the distinct pattern of Cluster 2 cannot be explained exclusively by global level of injury severity because the majority of the children in this cluster also had CT/MRI scan evidence for focal right hemisphere lesions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Children with THI often demonstrate greater and more persistent decrements in WISC-R Performance (PIQ) than in Verbal (VIQ) IQ scores, particularly with more severe injuries (for reviews, see Dalby & Obrzut, 1991;Donders & Kuldanek, in press;Fletcher & Levin, 1988). Specific subtypes of WISC-R subtest patterns after THI that are differentiated by both level and pattern of performance differences have also been described (Donders, 1993 Speed (PS) factor index scores, but not the Verbal Comprehension (VC) and Freedom from Distractibility (FD) factor index scores, have acceptable sensitivity to severity of THI (Donders, 1995(Donders, , 1997. However, no information is available regarding common patterns of performance on the WISC-I11 after THI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This again compares favorably to the findings in the WISC-I11 standardization sample where, for example, Symbol Search had loadings ranging from .30 to .60 across age groups on this factor. Prior findings in our laboratory (Donders, 1995) have suggested that the WISC-I11 PS factor is much more strongly correlated with length of coma in children with severe THI than are any of the other WISC-I11 indexes or any of the standard scores from the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (Kaufman & Kaufman, 1990). In combination with these previous findings, the current results strongly support the validity of the PS factor in the assessment of children with THI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The majority of studies have examined the relationship of the K-BIT to a variety of instruments including the WISC-R (Prewett, 1992a(Prewett, , 1992bSlate, Graham & Bower, 1996); the WISC-Ill (Canivez, 1995(Canivez, , 1996Donders, 1995;Javorsky, 1993;Levinson & Folino, 1994;Prewett, 1995;Smith, Buckley, & Pingatore, 1992;Smith, Wessels, & Riebel, 1997); the WPPSI-R (Lassiter & Bardos, 1995); the WAIS-R (Eisenstein & Engelhart, 1997;Naugle, Cheluna, & Tucker, 1993); the Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition (Prewett & McCafferty, 1983); the Shipley Institute for Living Scale (Bowers & Pantle, 1998); and the Slosson Intelligence Test-Revised (Smith, Klass, & Stovall, 1992). Full scale correlations between the K-BIT and thje WISC-R, WISC-lIl, and WAIS-R were significant and ranged from moderate to strong.…”
Section: Validity Studies Since Publication Of the Testmentioning
confidence: 99%