2007
DOI: 10.1080/09638280601030066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of the impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire: A comparison between two countries

Abstract: The cross-cultural validity of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire Abstract Purpose To evaluate the cross-cultural validity of the five subscales of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA) measure and the full 31-item scale. MethodData from two validation studies (Dutch and English) were pooled (n=106).Participants (aged 18-75), known to rehabilitation services or GP practices, had conditions ranging from minor ailments to significant disability. Validity of the five subscales and the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
58
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The IPA-S (21), which was developed through a forwardÁbackward translation procedure based on the original version of the IPA, has supported internal scale validity and reliability. Two additional items that cover perceptions of helping and supporting other people and problems related to this are, in accordance with the Dutch (23) and the English versions of the questionnaire (IPA-E) (24,25), included in the IPA-S. The validity of these items has been confirmed and found to be related to the domain of social relationship.…”
Section: Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The IPA-S (21), which was developed through a forwardÁbackward translation procedure based on the original version of the IPA, has supported internal scale validity and reliability. Two additional items that cover perceptions of helping and supporting other people and problems related to this are, in accordance with the Dutch (23) and the English versions of the questionnaire (IPA-E) (24,25), included in the IPA-S. The validity of these items has been confirmed and found to be related to the domain of social relationship.…”
Section: Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The English version of the IPA was validated by Sibley et al (2006). Reported internal consistency reliability estimates (Cronbach's alpha) for the five subscales ranged from .86 to .91 (Kersten et al, 2007). Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the IPA in this study was computed to be .95.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response options range from 0 (very good) to 4 (very poor), and a five-subscale score can be calculated. IPA-E is valid, reliable and sensitive to change (31,32).…”
Section: The Questionnaire Setmentioning
confidence: 98%