2018
DOI: 10.1177/0269215518788116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of the Actigraph GT3x and influence of the sensor positioning for the assessment of active energy expenditure during four activities of daily living in stroke subjects

Abstract: This study found large differences and a poor agreement between the active energy expenditure as measured by the Actigraph and the Metamax according to the location of the sensor and the type of task performed by the subject.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Physical activity participation (amount and intensity) was measured by accelerometers (Actigraph GTX3) worn by patients on their waist for three days immediately following admission to inpatient rehabilitation, three days preceding inpatient rehabilitation discharge, and three days following their threemonth follow-up assessment. 21,22 Patients were asked to wear the accelerometers at their waist (unaffected side) continuously for three days with removal only for bathing. Adherence to wearing the accelerometer as instructed was defined as wear time of greater than 90% of the assigned three days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Physical activity participation (amount and intensity) was measured by accelerometers (Actigraph GTX3) worn by patients on their waist for three days immediately following admission to inpatient rehabilitation, three days preceding inpatient rehabilitation discharge, and three days following their threemonth follow-up assessment. 21,22 Patients were asked to wear the accelerometers at their waist (unaffected side) continuously for three days with removal only for bathing. Adherence to wearing the accelerometer as instructed was defined as wear time of greater than 90% of the assigned three days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinicians and researchers have used AM in various ways, including assessing the effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation 15 and other behavioral interventions. 16 Additionally, AM have been used to quantify activity in populations such as children with cerebral palsy 17 and adults after stroke, 18 and have been used in rehabilitation settings like skilled nursing facilities and inpatient rehabilitation to gauge the intensity of exercises and patient participation during treatment sessions. 19,20 AM vary depending on the manufacturer and model but are often worn at waistlevel or on the distal aspect of the arm or leg.…”
Section: Distance Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in computing power and microelectronics enable these improvements in human performance assessment, with real-time physiological measurement capabilities and data processing to provide valuable information about the individual [17]. Currently available commercial systems include heart rate monitors [18], temperature sensors [19], accelerometers [20] and integrated sensors [21]. However, these apparatuses usually do not satisfy the requirements for more profound occupational research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%