Validity of Self-reported Hypertension and Factors Related to Discordance Between Self-reported and Objectively Measured Hypertension: Evidence From a Cohort Study in Iran

Abstract

Objectives Self-reporting can be used to determine the incidence and prevalence of hypertension (HTN). The present study was conducted to determine the validity of self-reported HTN and to identify factors affecting discordance between self-reported and objectively measured HTN in participants in the Ravansar Non-Communicable Diseases (RaNCD) cohort. Methods The RaNCD cohort included permanent residents of Ravansar, Iran aged 35-65 years. Self-reported data were collected before clinical examinations were conducted by well-trained staff members. The gold standard for HTN was anti-hypertensive medication use and blood pressure measurements. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy of self-reporting were calculated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to examine the discordance between self-reported HTN and the gold standard. Results Of the 10 065 participants in the RaNCD, 4755 (47.4%) were male. The prevalence of HTN was 16.8% based on self-reporting and 15.7% based on medical history and HTN measurements. Of the participants with HTN, 297 (18.8%) had no knowledge of their disease, and 313 (19.9%) had not properly controlled their HTN despite receiving treatment. The sensitivity, specificity, and kappa for self-reported HTN were 75.5%, 96.4%, and 73.4%, respectively. False positives became more likely with age, body mass index (BMI), low socioeconomic status, and female sex, whereas false negatives became more likely with age, BMI, high socioeconomic status, smoking, and urban residency. Conclusions The sensitivity and specificity of self-reported HTN were acceptable, suggesting that this method can be used for public health initiatives in the absence of countrywide HTN control and detection programs.

Food insecurity and hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis

“…As others have noted, the reliability of self-reported hypertension can vary widely along patient demographic lines, with particularly high false positives found among people of low socioeconomic status [66,67]. Furthermore, the accuracy of self-reported health depends greatly on patients' level of healthcare access and health literacy [68]. Given that low socioeconomic status is an important correlate as well as direct cause of FIS [69], issues of health literacy and a higher tendency for false positive self-reporting may, in part, explain the association found in this review.…”

Identifying Factors Associated With Hypertension Using Structural Equation Modeling: Evidence from a Large Kurdish Cohort Study in Iran

“…Both arms were measured twice with the cuff size adjusted to the arm circumference. Four BP measurements were taken to mean systolic and diastolic pressure (SBP and DBP) (21).…”

Examining elevated blood pressure and the effects of diabetes self-management education on blood pressure among a sample of Marshallese with type 2 diabetes in Arkansas

“…Furthermore, the analytic sample was refined based on self-reported previous diagnosis of hypertension. Although self-reported hypertension status is not as accurate as medical records and/or laboratory measures, it is a commonly used measure in population-based studies such as the BRFSS, NHANES, and NHIS and has been validated in numerous races/ethnicities as well as in other countries [43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. Additionally, the original study design was not powered to test hypotheses regarding undiagnosed high blood pressure but was powered to detect changes in HbA 1c .…”