1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1988.tb00526.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of Self‐reported Alcohol Use: a literature review and assessment*

Abstract: SummaryRecently, there has been increased attention to the validity of self‐reported alcohol use. Yet, much of the literature appears to be inappropriately seeking the definitive answer to a relative question, e.g. are self‐reports of alcohol use valid?. The literature on the validity of self‐reported alcohol use was reviewed with a primary focus on concurrent criterion‐oriented validity. Validity studies using collateral reports, diaries, official records, different interviewing methods, laboratory tests and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
209
1
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 467 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
4
209
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the validity of self-report data is sometimes called into question (e.g. Babor et al, 2000;Patrick et al, 1994;Frier et al, 1991;Midanik, 1988;Cooper et al, 1981). The data presented here are no better and no worse than other data of this type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…However, the validity of self-report data is sometimes called into question (e.g. Babor et al, 2000;Patrick et al, 1994;Frier et al, 1991;Midanik, 1988;Cooper et al, 1981). The data presented here are no better and no worse than other data of this type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…As in most other alcohol-related studies, we used selfreported alcohol consumption; other approaches are generally not practical in large cohort studies such as this. 30 Health professionals generally provide reliable reports of alcohol use, 31,32 though random misclassification of alcohol intake is possible if the physicians in this study generally underreported or underestimated their alcohol intake. This type of misclassification could have led to underestimation of any true protective association of light to moderate alcohol intake and CHD if heavier drinkers underreported to a greater extent than light or moderate drinkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, these analyses rely on comparisons of intake between groups categorised on stable characteristics rather than intake based on shortterm measurement. Under-reporting of intake is well recognised for dietary intake in general (47) and alcohol use in particular (48,49) . Under-reporting in the present survey was found to be progressively higher for overweight and for obese people (23) .…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%