2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2008.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of segmental multiple-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis to estimate body composition of adults across a range of body mass indexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
153
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
153
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from validation studies demonstrate that BIA routinely overestimates lean mass by 5-10% (15,16), when compared to DXA. These systematic errors in accuracy may therefore partly explain why lean mass findings differed between studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Results from validation studies demonstrate that BIA routinely overestimates lean mass by 5-10% (15,16), when compared to DXA. These systematic errors in accuracy may therefore partly explain why lean mass findings differed between studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…By means of multi-electrode configurations placed in different parts of the body, impedance measurements of the different segments can be made and local fluid distribution can be estimated. Using an eight-electrode SEG-BIA with three different frequencies (5, 50 and 250 kHz), Shafer et al (2009) analyzed 132 adults exhibiting a large range of body mass indexes (normal, overweight and obese) and found that body fat percent (BF%) can be accurately estimated in subjects classified as normal and overweight, while a significant overestimation was found in subjects classified as obese. Eight electrodes around the abdominal surface were used with SF-BIA at 50 kHz by Yoneda et al (2007) to estimate the visceral fat volume.…”
Section: Analysis Of Human Body Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The region of the trunk represents ~50% of the body fat-free mass but only ~10% of body resistance. In contrast, one arm and one leg comprise ~25% of the fat-free mass and up to ~90% of total body resistance [18,19]. Those proportions can be explained by virtue of the nature of the regression equations used in bioimpedance analysis, where body parts with smaller crosssection areas make a dominant effect on resistance.…”
Section: Real-time Telemetrymentioning
confidence: 99%