2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of screening tools for dementia and mild cognitive impairment among the elderly in primary health care: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
69
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have previously examined neurocognitive tests and identified a few top neurocognitive classifiers using non-machine learning methods, but they are not discussed here [9,[11][12][13] (see reviews by Abd Razak In sum, our results are comparable or compared favorably with previous studies although comparisons were not made on the same datasets. Our study is novel in that we employed a nonsupervised learning (as opposed to supervised learning) method, applied to a large and multi-center ADNI dataset with commonly used measures.…”
Section: Risk Score Modelsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies have previously examined neurocognitive tests and identified a few top neurocognitive classifiers using non-machine learning methods, but they are not discussed here [9,[11][12][13] (see reviews by Abd Razak In sum, our results are comparable or compared favorably with previous studies although comparisons were not made on the same datasets. Our study is novel in that we employed a nonsupervised learning (as opposed to supervised learning) method, applied to a large and multi-center ADNI dataset with commonly used measures.…”
Section: Risk Score Modelsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…A large array of neurocognitive tests are currently used to detect cognitive impairment and classify amongst normal controls (CN), EMCI, LMCI and AD [7][8]. Many studies have identified a few top classifiers using logistic regression and machine learning methods [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Some studies have also used MRI and genetic data in conjunction with neurocognitive measures for classification [19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brief evaluations for MCI are supported overall by studies reporting that cognitive screening tests have valuable sensitivity and specificity (Tsoi et al, 2017 ; Breton et al, 2019 ; Razak et al, 2019 ). However, some previous studies have already shown that dementia cases discovered by screening tests included patients with dementia at intermediate and advanced stages and, more rarely, patients with prodromal dementia (Riley McCarten et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Why Initial Brief Evaluations Could Be Inadequate To Detect mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the blank group(Cont), the differential ions in the model group(Mod) showed obvious up-down relationship. To further identify potential metabolic markers of MCI, we combined the matching degree in mass spectrometry and used related mass spectrometry websites such as: Human Metabolome Database [1] ; Lipidomics Gateway [2] ; METLIN Metabolite Database [3] . Differential metabolites were identified by SDBS [4] and related literature reports.…”
Section: Identification Of Differential Metabolitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific pathogenesis of MCI is not clear. At present, some hypotheses and studies have put forward [3], including senile plaque caused by β-amyloid (Aβ), nerve fiber tangles caused by hyperphosphorylation of Tau protein, synaptic dysfunction, chronic inflammatory cascade reaction, oxidative stress damage, etc. are the main pathogenesis of MCI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%