2019
DOI: 10.3390/medicina55110735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of Prediction Equations of Maximal Heart Rate in Physically Active Female Adolescents and the Role of Maturation

Abstract: Background and objectives: Maximal heart rate (HRmax) is an important training and testing tool, especially in the context of evaluating intensity in exercise prescription; however, few studies have examined the validity of prediction equations of HRmax in physically active female adolescents and the role of maturation level. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine the differences between measured and predicted HRmax in a sample of physically active female adolescents. Materials and Methods: Sev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding might be because Tanaka s equation was derived from adult populations aged from 20 to 81, excluding those younger than 20 years of age. In addition, HR max predicted by Tanaka s equation showed significant differences from the actual HR max of females in all age groups, which indicated a discrepancy in the results of some existing literature [13,40]. Since the previous studies have investigated the validity of the existing formula on female athletes in America and/or Europe, and there were no studies that had developed the HR max formula for females, an explanation of this discrepancy might be the different samples' characteristics (i.e., general population and race).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The finding might be because Tanaka s equation was derived from adult populations aged from 20 to 81, excluding those younger than 20 years of age. In addition, HR max predicted by Tanaka s equation showed significant differences from the actual HR max of females in all age groups, which indicated a discrepancy in the results of some existing literature [13,40]. Since the previous studies have investigated the validity of the existing formula on female athletes in America and/or Europe, and there were no studies that had developed the HR max formula for females, an explanation of this discrepancy might be the different samples' characteristics (i.e., general population and race).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The search resulted in three studies that developed new predictive equations: Mahon et al 12 classified with low methodological quality (50% score), Nikolaidis 23 with moderate quality (68%), and Gelbart et al 14 with high quality (82%). Ten studies performed external validation, of which only one was evaluated with low methodological quality (50%), 24 eight obtained scores between 50 and 70% attaining a moderate quality, [12][13][14][15]23,[25][26][27] and one scored 88%. 28 A single study was carried out to increase values to preexisting equations 29 and was classified as low quality (39%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From 11 studies, 10 contained nonobese pediatric subjects [12][13][14][15][23][24][25][26][27]29 and 1 contained obese pediatric subjects; 28 of the 10 studies with nonobese sample, 7 included physically active young people. 14,15,23,24,26,27,29 Regarding the criterion to consider the HRmax, 8 of the 11 included studies used the peak HR. [13][14][15]23,26,28,29 Mahon et al 12 measured HRmax as the highest mean value obtained from two consecutive 15 s HR recordings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 These formulas are simple to use but could underestimate or overestimate the measured HRmax. [8][9][10][11][12] The ACSM guidelines state that using directly measured HRmax is preferred to using estimated values for greater accuracy in determining exercise intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%