2002
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8675(2002)022<0934:vooaps>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of Otoliths and Pectoral Spines for Estimating Ages of Channel Catfish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
175
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
175
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Each fish was weighed to the nearest gram, measured to the nearest mm, sexed, aged, and fecundity was calculated. We used the lapilli otoliths to age each fish, which were removed by cranial dissection and dried before sanding (Buckmeier et al, 2002). We sanded the otoliths using 800-grit fine sandpaper dampened with water, until the nucleus was visible, similar to Buckmeier et al (2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each fish was weighed to the nearest gram, measured to the nearest mm, sexed, aged, and fecundity was calculated. We used the lapilli otoliths to age each fish, which were removed by cranial dissection and dried before sanding (Buckmeier et al, 2002). We sanded the otoliths using 800-grit fine sandpaper dampened with water, until the nucleus was visible, similar to Buckmeier et al (2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sections approximately 0.5 mm thick were cut through the dorsal and anterior processes. This location minimises the influence of the central lumen (Buckmeier, 2002). Photographs were taken of all pectoral spines for image analyses, which were carried out by means of ImageJ software (1.26 version).…”
Section: Back-calculation Of Total Lengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annuli were counted under a dissecting microscope with a fiber-optic light source. Two readers independently estimated the ages of fish without knowledge of fish length and disagreements were resolved by reexamining otoliths and mutually determining age (Buckmeier et al, 2002). To account for growth that occurred prior to the formation of annuli, one year was added to the number of visible annuli.…”
Section: Age Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%