2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of Myocardial Infarction Diagnoses in Administrative Databases: A Systematic Review

Abstract: BackgroundThough administrative databases are increasingly being used for research related to myocardial infarction (MI), the validity of MI diagnoses in these databases has never been synthesized on a large scale.ObjectiveTo conduct the first systematic review of studies reporting on the validity of diagnostic codes for identifying MI in administrative data.MethodsMEDLINE and EMBASE were searched (inception to November 2010) for studies: (a) Using administrative data to identify MI; or (b) Evaluating the vali… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
191
2
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
13
191
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In the LSS and AHS, different outcomes were observed, which are not easily compared. Additionally, some published studies showed the improved reliability of MI diagnosis at death with improved coding in the ICD-10 after 1995 (39) and the enhanced diagnostic tools, such as cardiac troponin tests (40)(41)(42)(43). In contrast, other studies revealed low validity of the MI diagnosis; sensitivity of diagnosis of IHD on death certificates was 86.5% (95% CI: 77.6, 92.3), specificity was 64.9% (58.4, 71.0), positive predictive value was 50.6% (42.7, 58.5) and negative predictive value was 92.0% (86.5, 95.5) when all cases were confirmed according to the criteria of the World Health Organization MONICA Project (Multinational MONItoring of trends and determinants in CArdiovascular disease) during the period of 1997-1998 (45,46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the LSS and AHS, different outcomes were observed, which are not easily compared. Additionally, some published studies showed the improved reliability of MI diagnosis at death with improved coding in the ICD-10 after 1995 (39) and the enhanced diagnostic tools, such as cardiac troponin tests (40)(41)(42)(43). In contrast, other studies revealed low validity of the MI diagnosis; sensitivity of diagnosis of IHD on death certificates was 86.5% (95% CI: 77.6, 92.3), specificity was 64.9% (58.4, 71.0), positive predictive value was 50.6% (42.7, 58.5) and negative predictive value was 92.0% (86.5, 95.5) when all cases were confirmed according to the criteria of the World Health Organization MONICA Project (Multinational MONItoring of trends and determinants in CArdiovascular disease) during the period of 1997-1998 (45,46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of administrative claims data for surveillance can be affected by reporting or coding changes and has been found to sometimes overestimate cardiovascular event rates, especially deaths 46. However, the analysis of these data to assess cardiovascular event rate trends are recommended for national surveillance and, when combined across communities, appears valid given that the overestimation likely will not vary greatly at the macro level and over this short period 46, 47, 48…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity and PPV were the most common validity measures, which is also consistent with other reviews of administrative health data quality. 35,36 There are a number of gaps in the current body of Canadian studies validating administrative health data. First, the majority of the studies examined databases from Alberta and Ontario.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43 Variations in findings across validation studies may be partly explained by differences in the reference standard. 36,44 Last, there is a dearth of studies that have validated methods for identifying individuals with mental health and acute health conditions using administrative health data. In some jurisdictions, multiple coding systems are used (i.e., ICD-9-CM, ICD-10-CA).…”
Section: Quality Of Administrative Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation