1995
DOI: 10.1016/0376-8716(95)01155-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of intravenous drug abusers' self-reported changes in HIV high-risk drug use behaviors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, our assessment of drug use was based on patient self-reports and social desirability bias cannot be excluded. Nevertheless, the validity and reliability of self-reports on active drug use using the OTI have already been established in many studies which used similar methods to our own (Darke, 1998;Greenfield et al, 1995), as well as in a previous study in which we documented a high level of agreement between self-reported heroin use and morphine detection in urine (Messiah et al, 2001). Second, reporting bias related to the relationship with one's physician is possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…First, our assessment of drug use was based on patient self-reports and social desirability bias cannot be excluded. Nevertheless, the validity and reliability of self-reports on active drug use using the OTI have already been established in many studies which used similar methods to our own (Darke, 1998;Greenfield et al, 1995), as well as in a previous study in which we documented a high level of agreement between self-reported heroin use and morphine detection in urine (Messiah et al, 2001). Second, reporting bias related to the relationship with one's physician is possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Such recall bias is especially likely when discussing needle and sexual partnerships with HIV-positive individuals during the risk interval. Self-reported behaviour from drug users has been evaluated in treatment programmes where as much as 50% of reported behaviour change has been called into question by checking with objective evaluation tools such as urinalysis 44 . However, studies where an in-depth interview is employed, as in the present study, report higher rates of accuracy than cursory clinical questionnaires 45 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Logically, those who drop out of treatment and then return are more likely to have gone back to injecting and consequently had greater potential for exposure to HIV than those who remained in treatment. Previous studies found that interruptions to methadone treatment were associated with increased prevalence of injecting drugs and sharing syringes (24, 25), resulting in an increased risk of new HIV infection. Findings such as this reinforce recommendations to provide HIV risk reduction counseling, including messages about safe injecting, to IDUs at the time of MMTP admissions (26, 27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%