2012
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1310106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of insertion depth measurement in double-balloon endoscopy

Abstract: Measurement of insertion depth in vivo was validated in the porcine model during progression and withdrawal. Estimation during progression was more accurate and allowed exploration dynamics and efficiency to be plotted, which might be used as approximate reference values for humans.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blood tests to determine the previously mentioned indices were scheduled to be performed the next morning. To estimate the depth of insertion, the insertion count method proposed by May et al was used [12,13]. In the EN-580T group, if the endoscopist found a lesion requiring endoscopic treatment, then therapeutic intervention was conducted at that time.…”
Section: Study Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood tests to determine the previously mentioned indices were scheduled to be performed the next morning. To estimate the depth of insertion, the insertion count method proposed by May et al was used [12,13]. In the EN-580T group, if the endoscopist found a lesion requiring endoscopic treatment, then therapeutic intervention was conducted at that time.…”
Section: Study Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was not done in any of the subjects in the present study primarily due to lack of progression from pleated gut over the scope. The validity of the insertion depth measurement has been described by Albors et al [11] in a porcine model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Sampling sites in the human gastrointestinal system. Biopsies were sampled from two specific sites in duodenum (1, 2) and seven specific sites in the distal ileum (10) and in colon (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). In the intermediate small intestine biopsies were sampled for every 30 cm and grouped into seven areas (3-9).…”
Section: Statistical Analyses and Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better understanding the problem in the last decade we have carried out several of experiments in porcine model[ 32 - 39 ] where oral DBE were systematically monitored. Although the porcine model was previously used both ex vivo and in vivo for DBE training and to increase the security conditions in translational studies[ 2 , 35 , 36 ], no previous in vivo studies were directly aimed at finding out the etiology of the post-DBE pancreatitis. In the present work, we are summarizing our findings[ 33 , 34 , 39 ], with addition of some unpublished results, and reviewing the related literature in order to gather substantial evidences supporting the vascular etiology as the most likely explanation for the potential appearance of pancreatitis after oral DBE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%