2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2016.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of inner canthus temperature recorded by infrared thermography as a non-invasive surrogate measure for core temperature at rest, during exercise and recovery

Abstract: Research into obtaining a fast, valid, reliable and non-invasive measure of core temperature is of interest in many disciplinary fields. Occupational and sports medicine research has attempted to determine a non-invasive proxy for core temperature particularly when access to participants is limited and thermal safety is of a concern due to protective encapsulating clothing, hot ambient environments and/or high endogenous heat production during athletic competition. This investigation aimed to determine the val… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(72 reference statements)
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth to mention that also other facial regions (e.g., forehead) have been demonstrated to be indicative of the core temperature. Anyway, in ecological conditions, such as large-scale fever screening, the inner canthus is proved to be less sensitive to external confounding, such as the environmental temperature, the employment of make-up and sweating [ 74 , 75 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth to mention that also other facial regions (e.g., forehead) have been demonstrated to be indicative of the core temperature. Anyway, in ecological conditions, such as large-scale fever screening, the inner canthus is proved to be less sensitive to external confounding, such as the environmental temperature, the employment of make-up and sweating [ 74 , 75 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next to metabolic heat production from the physical work, the two main factors influencing heat stress are the environmental conditions and use of personal protective clothing (PPC) and PPE [ 1 , 5 ]. Working in hot (sunny and humid) environments causes the body temperature to increase as a result of the inhibition of body heat loss [ 1 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Wearing full-body PPC and PPE hinders heat removal and so stimulates and increases heat stress as a result of thermal insulation and evaporative resistance [ 1 , 2 , 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, imprecise alignment in the ear may result in measuring the aural temperature instead of the ear canal temperature [ 33 , 34 , 36 , 37 ]. Third, if the insulation of the thermometer is insufficient in the ear [ 1 , 5 , 6 ], it is possible for the environmental or local temperature to influence the measurements [ 23 , 34 ]. To summarize, the Cosinuss° °Temp thermometer may form the basis for a non-invasive, non-obstructive monitoring system for workers with physically demanding (outdoor) occupations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, factors such as land leveling and soil moisture can locally affect grape production by up to 50% within the same vineyard. 173 Thus, productivity at a certain time of the day (e.g., when heat levels are at maximum) also reflects the amount of crop that is available for picking at that time which, as mentioned above, can vary by up to 50% within the same piece of land. This, in turn, can distort the final productivity assessment of the workers, and the conclusion on the effect of workplace heat on productivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time-motion analysis combined with physiological data can be valuable in assessing the physiological strain of workers during period of increased occupational heat stress. 174 Time-motion analysis includes analyzing movement and the time spent on each movement through video analysis. This method is very powerful, since the investigator can analyze every second spent by each worker during every work shift, thus accurately assessing WTL without bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%