1992
DOI: 10.2307/1982018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of Faculty Judgments of Student Performance: Relationship between Grades and Credits Earned and External Criterion Measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the chief flaws in using undergraduate grade point average is measurement error (Humphreys, 1968;Warren, 1971;Werts, Linn, & Joreskog, 1978). Smith (1992) argues that grade inflation is one possible factor for this incongruity, which thus limits the value of the variable as a predictor of graduate school success. Despite this limitation, Bowman, Chen, Tinkersley, and Hilliard (1993) found that 40% of MPA programs surveyed used undergraduate grade point average as the key factor in admission decisions.…”
Section: Admission Criteria and Student Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the chief flaws in using undergraduate grade point average is measurement error (Humphreys, 1968;Warren, 1971;Werts, Linn, & Joreskog, 1978). Smith (1992) argues that grade inflation is one possible factor for this incongruity, which thus limits the value of the variable as a predictor of graduate school success. Despite this limitation, Bowman, Chen, Tinkersley, and Hilliard (1993) found that 40% of MPA programs surveyed used undergraduate grade point average as the key factor in admission decisions.…”
Section: Admission Criteria and Student Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grade inflation in higher education is significant in most institutions, [25][26][27] causing students to be anxiously motivated in maintaining high grade point averages. Having objective grading criteria that clearly delineate a cumulative point structure for their final grade affects student motivation, decreases instructional ambiguity and student anxiety, and provides additional instructor time for student interaction and mentoring.…”
Section: Outcomes and Lessons Learnedmentioning
confidence: 99%