Validity of Destructive and Non-destructive Testing Module Based on Industrial Needs

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine the suitability of learning modules for destructive and non-destructive testing based on industry specifications. The Borg and Gall research and development method was used for this research. As a reference in the module, development used the ADDIE development form, namely (1) demand analysis; (2) design and conclusion of learning objectives; (3) development in the form of creation modules; and (4) formative assessment. Module validation is carried out by material expert, learning design expert, and learning media expert. The data collection technique was carried out by distributing questionnaires to find out the industry's wishes and the validating of the material being tested. Benchmarks for evaluating the module expert agreement using a test questionnaire with defined scores: 5 (very good), 4 (good), 3 (good enough), 2 (less good), and 1 (very bad) which were examined by descriptive approach. The research findings validated the validity of material experts 89.6% of the time, design training experts 91.5% of the time, and equipment training experts 88.3% of the time. As a result, the modules that have been created are ideal for application.