2012
DOI: 10.1378/chest.1390568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of CURB-65 in Predicting Mortality and ICU Admission in HIV-Positive Patients With Community Acquired Pneumonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the only prior study formally evaluating the CURB65 score it underestimated mortality and the requirement for ICU admission as HIV-infected patients had more than twice as high mortality and twice as long hospital and ICU stays compared with HIV-uninfected patients despite similar CURB65 scores. 39 While reasons for this discrepant performance of the CURB65 score between HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected adults are not clear, the age factor seems less important in typically younger HIV-infected patients, whose biological ages are reportedly 10–14 years advanced. 40–42 There are two possible non-exclusive explanations for the lack of correlation between NP colonisation density and the Pitt bacteraemia score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the only prior study formally evaluating the CURB65 score it underestimated mortality and the requirement for ICU admission as HIV-infected patients had more than twice as high mortality and twice as long hospital and ICU stays compared with HIV-uninfected patients despite similar CURB65 scores. 39 While reasons for this discrepant performance of the CURB65 score between HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected adults are not clear, the age factor seems less important in typically younger HIV-infected patients, whose biological ages are reportedly 10–14 years advanced. 40–42 There are two possible non-exclusive explanations for the lack of correlation between NP colonisation density and the Pitt bacteraemia score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,20 However, a Canadian group found that CURB-65 may underestimate mortality in this group and advised against using CURB-65 altogether. 21 An American group applied a scoring system called the Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS) Index with specific focus on older HIV-positive individuals (age ≥ 50) and 30-day mortality, length of stay and readmission. Other than age, this scoring system is comprised of completely different components than CURB-65 and PSI, including CD4 cell count and viral load.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many respiratory severity scores that use clinical and laboratory data have been developed to risk stratify and predict outcomes of patients hospitalized with pneumonia including the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and CURB-65 scores [ 2 5 ]. Although these scores are used frequently in clinical practice, including in South Africa, they were developed and validated among HIV-uninfected adults in high income settings and may therefore underestimate mortality risk in HIV-infected adults in resource-limited settings [ 6 ]. Several respiratory severity scores have been developed for hospitalized HIV-infected adults and children [ 7 9 ], but they are not widely used or have not been prospectively validated to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%