2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of cognitive complaints in substance-abusing patients and non-clinical controls: The Patient's Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from studies in users of other substances who were treatment-engaged (Richardson-Vejlgaard et al, 2009; Shelton et al, 1987; Errico et al, 1990), as well as non-substance-using participants with depression (e.g., Farrin et al, 2003), are consistent with these results. For example,Errico et al (1990) study, it was found that among measures of depression, anxiety, and neuropsychological impairment (all subjective), as well as objective measures of neurocognitive functioning,.the strongest correlations were among the subjective measures, in participants with alcohol dependence.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Results from studies in users of other substances who were treatment-engaged (Richardson-Vejlgaard et al, 2009; Shelton et al, 1987; Errico et al, 1990), as well as non-substance-using participants with depression (e.g., Farrin et al, 2003), are consistent with these results. For example,Errico et al (1990) study, it was found that among measures of depression, anxiety, and neuropsychological impairment (all subjective), as well as objective measures of neurocognitive functioning,.the strongest correlations were among the subjective measures, in participants with alcohol dependence.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Following the procedure from a previously reported study (Richardson et al, 2009), baseline level of verbal memory and verbal learning impairments were determined by using the WTAR as premorbid estimate of verbal IQ. The HVLT Total T-Score and Trial 3 T-score were converted to z scores along with the WTAR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total score ranges from 33 to 198, with 33 indicating the highest degree of perceived impairment and 198 indicating no perceived impairment. The PAOF is a valid and reliable instrument for self-reported cognitive impairment, and has been used in various clinical populations [1923]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%