Validity of Cochlear Microphonics at High Sound Pressure Levels as an Important Clinical Aspect

Teschner, Matthias; Lenarz, T; Battmer, R. D.

doi:10.1159/000334948

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Fibrous tissue growth that destroys cochlear tissue can be rapid with meningitis, so a negative ECoG is not unexpected. Recently, it has been reported that some patients with meningitis produce ECoGs (28), but these are apparently artifacts because with the same set-up similar results were obtained from saline-soaked drapes (29). It is not yet clear what the source of the artifact might be in those recordings, but in our recordings clamping of the sound tube virtually eliminated all responses.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 82%

Round Window Electrocochleography Just Before Cochlear Implantation

Fitzpatrick

Campbell

Choudhury

et al. 2014

Otology &Amp; Neurotology

117

145

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hypotheses Electrocochleography (ECoG) to acoustic stimuli can differentiate relative degrees of cochlear responsiveness across the population of cochlear implant recipients. The magnitude of the ongoing portion of the ECoG, which includes both hair cell and neural contributions, will correlate with speech outcomes as measured by results on CNC word score tests. Background Postoperative speech outcomes with cochlear implants vary from almost no benefit to near normal comprehension. A factor expected to have a high predictive value is the degree of neural survival. However, speech performance with the implant does not correlate with the number and distribution of surviving ganglion cells when measured post-mortem. We will investigate whether ECoG can provide an estimate of cochlear function that helps predict postoperative speech outcomes. Methods An electrode was placed at the ipsilateral round window of the ear about to be implanted during implant surgery. Tone bursts were delivered through an insert earphone. Subjects included children (N=52, 1–18 years) and postlingually hearing impaired adults (N=32). Word scores at six months were available from 21 adult subjects. Results Significant responses to sound were recorded from almost all subjects (80/84 or 95%). The ECoG magnitudes spanned more than 50 dB in both children and adults. The distributions of ECoG magnitudes and frequencies were similar between children and adults. The correlation between the ECoG magnitude and word score accounted for 47% of the variance. Conclusions ECoGs with high signal to noise ratios can be recorded from almost all implant candidates, including both adult and pediatric populations. In post-lingual adults, the ECoG magnitude is more predictive of implant outcomes than other non-surgical variables such as duration of deafness or degree of residual hearing.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 82%

Round Window Electrocochleography Just Before Cochlear Implantation

Fitzpatrick

Campbell

Choudhury

et al. 2014

Otology &Amp; Neurotology

117

145

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Especially with stimulation levels of 80 dB normal hearing level (nHL) and more there is a certain possibility for false positive responses which was investigated, for example, by Teschner, Lenarz, and Battmer (2012) using a transtympanic needle electrode. Here ECochG recordings were performed on a wet flannel and a pumpkin with a stiff needle electrode.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Monitoring of the Inner Ear Function During and After Cochlear Implant Insertion Using Electrocochleography

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To preserve residual hearing during cochlear implant (CI) surgery, it is desirable to use intraoperative monitoring of inner ear function (cochlear monitoring), especially during electrode insertion. A promising method is electrocochleography (ECochG). Within this project, the relations between ongoing responses (ORs), recorded extra-and intracochlearly (EC and IC), and preservation of residual hearing were investigated. Before, during, and after insertion of hearing preservation electrodes, intraoperative ECochG recordings were performed EC using a cotton wick electrode and after insertion also IC using the CI electrode (MED-EL) and a research software tool. The stimulation was delivered acoustically using low frequency tone bursts. The recordings were conducted in 10 adult CI recipients. The amplitudes of IC ORs were detected to be larger than EC ORs. Intraoperative EC thresholds correlated highly to preoperative audiometric thresholds at 1000 Hz, IC thresholds highly at 250 Hz and 500 Hz. The correlations of both intraoperative ECochG recordings to postoperative pure tone thresholds were low. When measured postoperatively at the same appointments, IC OR thresholds correlated highly to audiometric pure tone thresholds. For all patients, it was possible to record ORs during or directly after electrode insertion. Consequently, we conclude that we did not observe any cases with severe IC trauma. Delayed hearing loss could not be predicted with our method. Nevertheless, intraoperative ECochG recordings are a promising tool to gain further insight into mechanisms impacting residual hearing. Postoperatively recorded IC OR thresholds seem to be a reliable tool for frequency specific hearing threshold estimation.

show abstract

“…When the electrode was placed too close to the stapes at the oval window, the oscillations of the incoming sound waves also led to movement of the recording electrode and, in turn, to oscillation of the impedance between the recording electrode and recording site. Thus, an artifact that looks very similar to the recorded response signal is induced, especially at stimulation levels from 80 dB nHL upward, such that the two are virtually indistinguishable ( Teschner, Lenarz & Battmer, 2012 ). Attempts have been made to remedy this by using cotton wick electrodes, in which the tip of the metal electrode is wrapped in wet medical cotton ( Calloway et al, 2014 ; Haumann et al, 2019 ; Mandalà, Colletti, Tonoli & Colletti, 2012 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Intraoperative Extracochlear Electrocochleography Correlate With Postoperative Audiometric Hearing Thresholds in Cochlear Implant Surgery? A Retrospective Analysis of Cochlear Monitoring

Haumann,

Mynarek (née Bradler),

Maier

et al. 2024

Trends in Hearing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, tools for early detection of irreversible trauma to the basilar membrane during hearing preservation cochlear implant (CI) surgery were established in several clinics. A link with the degree of postoperative hearing preservation in patients was investigated, but patient populations were usually small. Therefore, this study's aim was to analyze data from intraoperative extracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) recordings for a larger group. During hearing preservation CI surgery, extracochlear recordings were made before, during, and after CI electrode insertion using a cotton wick electrode placed at the promontory. Before and after insertion, amplitudes and stimulus response thresholds were recorded at 250, 500, and 1000 Hz. During insertion, response amplitudes were recorded at one frequency and one stimulus level. Data from 121 patient ears were analyzed. The key benefit of extracochlear recordings is that they can be performed before, during, and after CI electrode insertion. However, extracochlear ECochG threshold changes before and after CI insertion were relatively small and did not independently correlate well with hearing preservation, although at 250 Hz they added some significant information. Some tendencies—although no significant relationships—were detected between amplitude behavior and hearing preservation. Rising amplitudes seem favorable and falling amplitudes disadvantageous, but constant amplitudes do not appear to allow stringent predictions. Extracochlear ECochG measurements seem to only partially realize expected benefits. The questions now are: do gains justify the effort, and do other procedures or possible combinations lead to greater benefits for patients?

show abstract

Validity of Cochlear Microphonics at High Sound Pressure Levels as an Important Clinical Aspect

Cited by 4 publications

References 25 publications

Round Window Electrocochleography Just Before Cochlear Implantation

Round Window Electrocochleography Just Before Cochlear Implantation

Monitoring of the Inner Ear Function During and After Cochlear Implant Insertion Using Electrocochleography

Does Intraoperative Extracochlear Electrocochleography Correlate With Postoperative Audiometric Hearing Thresholds in Cochlear Implant Surgery? A Retrospective Analysis of Cochlear Monitoring

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About