2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-014-9505-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of CBM measures of oral reading fluency and reading comprehension on high-stakes reading assessments in Grades 7 and 8

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
2
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
25
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although previous studies have documented strong bivariate correlations between ORF and reading comprehension for students beyond the early elementary grades, findings also suggest a decline in the strength of the association between ORF and reading comprehension as students move beyond grade 3 (Baker et al, 2015; Barth et al, 2012; Espin & Foegen, 1996; Espin, Wallace, Lembke, Campbell, & Long, 2010; Ticha, Espin, & Wayman, 2009; Yovanoff et al, 2005). Studies show that measures of language skills, such as vocabulary and maze tasks, are more predictive than ORF for comprehension in older students (Denton et al, 2011; Espin & Foegen, 1996; Shapiro, Solari, & Petscher, 2008; Stevenson, 2015; Yovanoff et al, 2005).…”
Section: What Does Orf Measure?contrasting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although previous studies have documented strong bivariate correlations between ORF and reading comprehension for students beyond the early elementary grades, findings also suggest a decline in the strength of the association between ORF and reading comprehension as students move beyond grade 3 (Baker et al, 2015; Barth et al, 2012; Espin & Foegen, 1996; Espin, Wallace, Lembke, Campbell, & Long, 2010; Ticha, Espin, & Wayman, 2009; Yovanoff et al, 2005). Studies show that measures of language skills, such as vocabulary and maze tasks, are more predictive than ORF for comprehension in older students (Denton et al, 2011; Espin & Foegen, 1996; Shapiro, Solari, & Petscher, 2008; Stevenson, 2015; Yovanoff et al, 2005).…”
Section: What Does Orf Measure?contrasting
confidence: 56%
“…The small R -squares across the models suggest that ORF does not explain much of the variance in reading comprehension outcomes for these upper elementary struggling readers. This finding is in line with prior research demonstrating that a combination of fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension measures leads to higher predictive accuracy of reading comprehension problems for students in upper grades than solely relying on ORF (e.g.,Baker et al, 2015; Nese, Park, Alonzo, & Tindal, 2011; Yavanoof et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Otros investigadores confirman que la falta de fluidez lectora impide que muchos estudiantes accedan a un nivel superior (Castejón, González-Pumariega, y Cuetos, 2011;Cuetos, 2009;Etxebarria, Gaminde, Romero e Iglesias, 2016;Fuchs, Fuchs, Hosp y Jenkins, 2009;Guthrie, Klauda y Ho, 2013;Kuhn, Schwanenflugel, Meisinger, Levy y Rasinski, 2010;Wolf y KatzirCohen, 2001) incluso en el nivel de secundaria (Baker et al, 2014;Paige, Rasinski, MagpuriLavell, y Smith, 2014;Rasinski et al, 2005Rasinski et al, , 2016.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Reading fluency is a common target of intervention and progress monitoring in RtI based on the importance of automaticity in cognitive processing theories of reading comprehension (LaBerge & Samuels, ) and due to its relationship with generalized reading outcomes (Baker et al, ; L. S. Fuchs, Fuchs, Hosp, & Jenkins, ). Numerous studies have tested interventions designed to increase reading fluency, and the Chard, Vaughn, and Tyler () synthesis of the literature suggests that effective reading fluency interventions include repeated readings (RR) in which a short passage is reread until a fluency criterion is met (Samuels, ) or a specific number of readings are completed; modeling procedures, in which the reader follows along silently while a more skilled reader reads the passage aloud (i.e., listening passage preview [LPP]; Rose & Sherry, ); and corrective feedback involving student practice of words read incorrectly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%