2015
DOI: 10.1121/2.0000076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of an acoustic method to assess whole-body hydration status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the sensitivity of the hydration monitor should be better than the clinically relevant level of dehydration of 2%. Available data on the variations of ultrasound velocity in the human calf indicate that 2% percent of total body water loss results in a velocity increase in the range 2–3 m/s [7, 24]. Accordingly, in testing the HM device, the acceptable level of ultrasound velocity measurement error in the muscle was set as 1 m/s.…”
Section: Hm Bench Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consequently, the sensitivity of the hydration monitor should be better than the clinically relevant level of dehydration of 2%. Available data on the variations of ultrasound velocity in the human calf indicate that 2% percent of total body water loss results in a velocity increase in the range 2–3 m/s [7, 24]. Accordingly, in testing the HM device, the acceptable level of ultrasound velocity measurement error in the muscle was set as 1 m/s.…”
Section: Hm Bench Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Description of the study details is presented in [24]. The goal of the study on athletes was to test the ability of HM to track changes in total body water during periods of acute dehydration and rehydration and day-to-day and diurnal variability of hydration in elderly.…”
Section: Human Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation