2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00218.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of adult retrospective reports of adverse childhood experiences: review of the evidence

Abstract: Retrospective studies have a worthwhile place in research, but further research is needed to examine possible biases in reporting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

31
1,635
4
26

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,335 publications
(1,743 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
31
1,635
4
26
Order By: Relevance
“…Given this and our sample size, subsamples based on type of I‐ELT were not tested individually. We note, though, that a recent study on the validity of retrospective reports (Hardt & Rutter, 2004) suggests the greatest bias occurs in the details of abuse, not whether abuse occurs, suggesting that the broad level of classification used in the present study (I‐ELT + vs. I‐ELT − ) is most appropriate given our sample size and population. Considering these factors, we believe that our findings, while limited in terms of the impact of various abuse‐related traumas, do provide consistent and important findings that support greater efforts towards characterizing the cognitive and neural impact of interpersonal trauma in childhood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Given this and our sample size, subsamples based on type of I‐ELT were not tested individually. We note, though, that a recent study on the validity of retrospective reports (Hardt & Rutter, 2004) suggests the greatest bias occurs in the details of abuse, not whether abuse occurs, suggesting that the broad level of classification used in the present study (I‐ELT + vs. I‐ELT − ) is most appropriate given our sample size and population. Considering these factors, we believe that our findings, while limited in terms of the impact of various abuse‐related traumas, do provide consistent and important findings that support greater efforts towards characterizing the cognitive and neural impact of interpersonal trauma in childhood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Extensive reviews of documented childhood experiences have found that people are more likely to have forgotten past negative events they have experienced than to have remembered events they have not (Brewin, Andrews, & Gotlib, 1993; Hardt & Rutter, 2004). These reviews point to evidence that younger and older people's reports of their childhoods are more in accord with those of independent observers than with their parents' reports.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the method of retrospective self-report could lack validity, as self-reports may be influenced by forgetting, lack of awareness, or reporting bias related to emotional states or gender roles (Tolin & Foa, 2006). However, false negatives appear to be more common than false positives in the general population, and possible biased associations between retrospective reports of CMT and psychopathology may be the result of the rehearsal of memories, rather than bias related to current emotional states (Hardt & Rutter, 2004). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%