2002
DOI: 10.1067/mem.2002.125708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of a decision rule to reduce cervical spine radiography in elderly patients with blunt trauma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
53
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Not surprisingly, current diagnostic and management protocols advise more liberal use of CT, particularly in the elderly population [19,22,23].…”
Section: Why Does Geriatric Brain Injury Differ?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Not surprisingly, current diagnostic and management protocols advise more liberal use of CT, particularly in the elderly population [19,22,23].…”
Section: Why Does Geriatric Brain Injury Differ?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rigidity of the cervical spine makes the occipitocervical junction more prone to injury; thereby, upper cervical (C) spine injuries relatively more frequently accompany gTBI than subaxial C-spine fractures [19,20]. Similarly reduced flexibility of the cranial-cranio-cervical structures as well as reduced turgor of the soft tissues around, including that of the cervical muscles, may account for the surprisingly high incidence of positive computed tomography (CT) findings, reaching to more than 10 % of minor head injuries in the elderly [21].…”
Section: Why Does Geriatric Brain Injury Differ?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LOE 5 National X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) identified midline cervical neck tenderness, focal neurological deficit, altered mental status, intoxication, and distracting injury as the 5 key clinical criteria predicting high risk for spine injury in adults, 61 children, 62 and the elderly 63 and demonstrated that elimination of any of these factors weakened the predictive value. 64 The LOE 5 Canadian C-Spine Rule (CCR) study 65 identified age Ն65 years, dangerous injury mechanism, and paresthesia as conditions that should create a high level of suspicion for cervical spine injury.…”
Section: Consensus On Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported than cervical fractures in the elderly are more likely to occur from falls, while cervical fractures in younger patients are more likely to occur from higher energy impact activities, such as high-speed motor vehicle accidents. 24 There also is a disproportionate increase in the prevalence of C2 fractures in the elderly, including an 8-fold increase in the prevalence of odontoid fractures in patients greater than 65 years of age compared to younger patients. 24 While the reason for the increase in odontoid fractures and the precise mechanism of odontoid fractures in the elderly is not known, it has been hypothesized that it may be due to several factors, including the pattern of mechanical stress placed on the cervical spine in falls commonly seen in the elderly population, the weakening effects of osteopenia on the narrow odontoid, and the pattern of progressive degenerative changes in the cervical spine.…”
Section: Discussion Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 While the reason for the increase in odontoid fractures and the precise mechanism of odontoid fractures in the elderly is not known, it has been hypothesized that it may be due to several factors, including the pattern of mechanical stress placed on the cervical spine in falls commonly seen in the elderly population, the weakening effects of osteopenia on the narrow odontoid, and the pattern of progressive degenerative changes in the cervical spine. 10,24 Nonetheless, it has been recommended that there should be concern for serious cervical spine injuries in any older patient who presents with a history of minor trauma or a fall, and that C2 in-…”
Section: Discussion Fmentioning
confidence: 99%