2013
DOI: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of 2D lateral cephalometry in orthodontics: a systematic review

Abstract: Lateral cephalometric radiography is commonly used as a standard tool in orthodontic assessment and treatment planning. The aim of this study was to evaluate the available scientific literature and existing evidence for the validation of using lateral cephalometric imaging for orthodontic treatment planning. The secondary objective was to determine the accuracy and reliability of this technique. We did not attempt to evaluate the value of this radiographic technique for other purposes. A literature search was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
75
3
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
75
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…9,10,11 The current study corroborated the recent findings of Li et al, 11 who reported right-and left-side differences in spatial positioning of glenoid fossae of patients with Class II subdivision malocclusion. Although they assessed the position of glenoid fossae in Class II subdivision in comparison with Class I patients, the present study is the first to have compared Class II subdivision with skeletal Class II patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…9,10,11 The current study corroborated the recent findings of Li et al, 11 who reported right-and left-side differences in spatial positioning of glenoid fossae of patients with Class II subdivision malocclusion. Although they assessed the position of glenoid fossae in Class II subdivision in comparison with Class I patients, the present study is the first to have compared Class II subdivision with skeletal Class II patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…7,8 Research has shown that to evaluate facial skeletal asymmetries, three-dimensional (3D) imaging is mandatory. 9 Indeed, with the increased use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), studies have found results contrasting those of previous 2D investigations. Recent 3D evidence has shown that a Class II subdivision malocclusion might be associated not only with asymmetric occlusal pattern but also with skeletal components, [9][10][11] and 3D studies show great potential to aid in the visualization of the skull and TMJ structures.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, computer-aided methods are currently the most clinically efficient techniques for cephalometric analyses. The aforementioned problem of random error, especially as it relates to the reproducibility of landmark identification, has been the subject of numerous studies [4,11]. However, to our knowledge, none of these previous studies has addressed the possible influence of landmark errors on cephalometric angular measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%