2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2013001300019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire to assess food group intake in adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
18
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourteen original articles retrieved through the mentioned systematic literature review and two more papers updated to May 2015 (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36) were identified as studies assessing the validation of FFQ against reference dietary instruments, translating the food intakes into nutrient intakes and targeting adolescent populations in the age range 13-17 years (Table 1). A high variability was highlighted between the studies (5) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Fourteen original articles retrieved through the mentioned systematic literature review and two more papers updated to May 2015 (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36) were identified as studies assessing the validation of FFQ against reference dietary instruments, translating the food intakes into nutrient intakes and targeting adolescent populations in the age range 13-17 years (Table 1). A high variability was highlighted between the studies (5) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study-specific ES and 95 % CI are represented by the black diamond and horizontal line, respectively; the area of the grey square is proportional to the specific-study weight to the overall meta-analysis. The centre of the open diamond presents the pooled ES and its width represents the pooled 95 % CI (21) Araujo et al (2010) (22) Bertoli et al (2005) (23) Cullen et al (2008) (24) Dechamps et al (2009) (25) Hong et al (2010) (26) Lietz et al (2002) (27) Martinez et al (2013) (28) Nurul-Fadhilah et al (2012) (29) Papadopoulou et al (2008) (30) Slater et al (2003) (33) Vereecken et al (2010) (34) Subtotal ( (21) Araujo et al (2010) (22) Bertoli et al (2005) (23) Cullen et al (2008) (24) Dechamps et al (2009) (25) Hong et al (2010) (26) Martinez et al (2013) (27) Nurul-Fadhilah et al (2012) (29) Slater et al (2003) (33) Watson et al (2009) (36) Subtotal ( High study quality…”
Section: Meta-analysis Study Of Correlation Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations