Validity and reliability of the MD Anderson dysphagia inventory in English and Chinese in head and neck cancer patients

Abstract

Aims: Patient-reported outcome measures are important in assessing the impact of dysphagia on quality of life. Our aim was to adapt and examine the cultural validity and reliability of a swallowing-related quality of life measure, the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), in English and Chinese, with head and neck cancer patients. Methods: We adapted the MDADI to Chinese through formal forward-backward translation. Sixty-six head and neck cancer survivors completed the MDADI, Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL) questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in English or Chinese. Swallowing status was scored on the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS). Seventy-four percent (n = 49) of participants completed a repeat administration of the MDADI for test-retest reliability analysis. Results: The MDADI showed high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α , 0.82 ≤ α ≤ 0.94), and test-retest reliability in both English (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = 0.81) and Chinese (ICC = 0.72). Criterion validity was established through moderate to strong correlations with relevant SWAL-QOL domains. Convergent validity was determined by significant correlations to the HADS and FOIS. Divergent validity was determined by nonsignificant association to the SWAL-QOL Sleep domain. The MDADI also presented as hypothesised to most known-group theoretical constructs. Conclusions: The MDADI showed good psychometric properties in English and Chinese. This avails a reliable and psychometrically valid MDADI for Chinese speakers.

Acute Swallowing Outcomes After Surgical Resection of Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Cancers With the Mandibular Lingual Release Approach

“…CSE was conducted per the profession's peak national organization guidelines (Speech Pathology Australia) 15 . Outcomes of fluid/diet trials were scored with the Functional Oral Intake Scale 16 (FOIS): a 7‐point scale validated for stroke but commonly used in research reporting head and neck cancer 17–19 . FOIS defines dysphagia severity based on fluid/diet modification and dependence on enteral feeding (FOIS = 1, nil by mouth [NBM]; FOIS = 7, total oral diet).…”

“…15 Outcomes of fluid/diet trials were scored with the Functional Oral Intake Scale 16 (FOIS): a 7-point scale validated for stroke but commonly used in research reporting head and neck cancer. [17][18][19] FOIS defines dysphagia severity based on fluid/diet modification and dependence on enteral feeding (FOIS = 1, nil by mouth [NBM]; FOIS = 7, total oral diet). For this study, FOIS data were recategorized into 4 severity categories: normal (FOIS = 7), total oral diet; mild (FOIS = 6), total oral diet, specific limitations; moderate (FOIS = 5), total oral diet, special preparation/compensations; and severe (FOIS 4), total oral diet, single consistency/tube dependent 6 some oral intake.…”