2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.02.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and reliability of the self-care of hypertension inventory (SC-HI) in a Brazilian population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the original version, self-care management and self-care confidence were one-factor models, whereas self-care management was a two-factor model [6]. We found the following differences in the items allocated to self-care management components across the two existing models [6,9]: autonomous (US: scmn 14, 15, and 17; Brazilian: scmn 12, 15, and 17); and consultative (US: scmn 12, 13, and 16; Brazilian; scmn 13, 14, and 16). Thus, we conducted CFA on all Self-Care Management models where the Thai model EFA factorial differed from the previous models.…”
Section: Thai Scehi (Version 20) Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the original version, self-care management and self-care confidence were one-factor models, whereas self-care management was a two-factor model [6]. We found the following differences in the items allocated to self-care management components across the two existing models [6,9]: autonomous (US: scmn 14, 15, and 17; Brazilian: scmn 12, 15, and 17); and consultative (US: scmn 12, 13, and 16; Brazilian; scmn 13, 14, and 16). Thus, we conducted CFA on all Self-Care Management models where the Thai model EFA factorial differed from the previous models.…”
Section: Thai Scehi (Version 20) Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The recent Thai, and the previous US [6] and Brazilian [9] selfcare management models had different items belonging to autonomous and consultative dimensions. We conducted CFA on these three models.…”
Section: Self-care Management Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scores of 70 or greater indicate self‐care adequacy. Internal consistency reliabilities for the SCHI three subscales are 0.83 for maintenance; 0.78 for management; and 0.94 for confidence (Silveira et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original study (Dickson et al, 2017) reported a Cronbach's alpha 0.83–0.97 for the overall scale. Zhao and colleagues (2019) reported an item‐level content validity index of 0.833, and Silveira and Colleagues (2020) reported Cronbach's alpha 0.83 (maintenance), 0.78(management) and 0.97 (confidence). In this study, the tool was assessed for internal consistency at baseline and the Cronbach's alpha was 0.88.…”
Section: Quantitative Strandmentioning
confidence: 99%