2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and reliability of the English version of the Student Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire among Arabic-speaking undergraduate students at health sciences colleges: A cross-sectional study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study's findings are consistent with those of previous studies as it demonstrated the reliability and validity of the translated S-EBPQ-Chinese version [ 16 ], S-EBPQ-Korean version [ 36 ], and untranslated S-EBPQ-English version [ 14 , 35 , 37 ]. The internal consistency of the Arabic version of the S-EBPQ was 0.897 across the entire scale.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The study's findings are consistent with those of previous studies as it demonstrated the reliability and validity of the translated S-EBPQ-Chinese version [ 16 ], S-EBPQ-Korean version [ 36 ], and untranslated S-EBPQ-English version [ 14 , 35 , 37 ]. The internal consistency of the Arabic version of the S-EBPQ was 0.897 across the entire scale.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Thus, it is similar to the original structure of Upton et al [ 14 ]. In addition, the four-factor structure explained 64% of the variance, which is similar to the original scale that explained 65% of the variance [ 14 ], while the S-EBPQ-English version in Saudi context explained 62% of the total variance [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation