2011
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.111.613521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and Reliability of the Barthel Index Administered by Telephone

Abstract: Background and Purpose-We aimed to evaluate validity and reliability of the Barthel Index administered telephonically compared with face-to-face assessment in clinically stable patients with stroke. Methods-One hundred thirty-one patients were interviewed twice by 2 registered nurses with identical training. Half of the patients were randomized to receive the telephone interview followed by the face-to-face interview and half the contrary. The sequence of interviewers was randomized. Results-The

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Face-to-face mRS assessment have been reported to be prone to bias and inter-rater variability, which may be improved by using structured interviews [40,41,42]. Telephone assessments of mRS and BI likely suffer from the same shortcomings, although some have shown them to be as reliable as face-to-face evaluations [43,44,45,46]. On the other hand, telephone-based assessments improve subject retention and minimize missing data in longitudinal studies [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Face-to-face mRS assessment have been reported to be prone to bias and inter-rater variability, which may be improved by using structured interviews [40,41,42]. Telephone assessments of mRS and BI likely suffer from the same shortcomings, although some have shown them to be as reliable as face-to-face evaluations [43,44,45,46]. On the other hand, telephone-based assessments improve subject retention and minimize missing data in longitudinal studies [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients are considered cognitively impaired if they fail to answer any of the four questions [13]. (2) Barthel Index, a 10-item questionnaire with three levels of answers, which assesses the level of independence with activities of daily living [14,15]. (3) Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13), is a 13-item questionnaire that measures frailty in older persons.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BI and the MMCI have been proved to be valid and reliable instruments. The BI, which has already been tested in the stroke population, has been shown to have adequate reliability and validity (Della Pietra et al, ). In the current study, the Cronbach's alpha was 0.93.…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%