2017
DOI: 10.15171/jcs.2017.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and Reliability of the Questionnaire for Assessing Women’s Reproductive History in Azar Cohort Study

Abstract: This study was done to evaluate the validity and reliability of women’s reproductive history questionnaire which will be used in Azar Cohort study; a cohort that is conducted by Tabriz University of Medical Science in Shabestar county for identifying risk factors of no communicable diseases. Content and face validity were evaluated by ten experts in the field and quantified as content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR). To assess the reliability, using test-retest approach, kappa statistic w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where: N is the total number of experts and n is the number of experts who have selected the "necessary item" option. The minimum acceptable CVR value for a total of 10 experts is equal to 0.62 (Pezshki et al, 2017). Items with CVR values lower than this threshold should be eliminated from the test due to lack of suitable content validity.…”
Section: Reliability and Validity Of The Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where: N is the total number of experts and n is the number of experts who have selected the "necessary item" option. The minimum acceptable CVR value for a total of 10 experts is equal to 0.62 (Pezshki et al, 2017). Items with CVR values lower than this threshold should be eliminated from the test due to lack of suitable content validity.…”
Section: Reliability and Validity Of The Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The content validity index and content validity ratio values of the questionnaire could not be assessed, as all the necessary criteria – relevancy, clarity, simplicity, and necessity were not assessed. [ 33 ] The practices could not be directly assessed due to practical difficulties experienced during the pilot study. In addition to this, the direct observation of the respondents when they start riding a two-wheeler may create a subjective bias or may indirectly encourage them to wear the helmet due to our observation (Hawthorne effect).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the pretest survey was conducted, with a response rate of 73.33% (42.86% academics and 100% consultants). After modifying the mailed questionnaire based on the feedback received through the pretest survey, the validity assessment was proceeded according to procedures documented by Ghahramani and Khalkhali (2015) as well as Pezeshki et al. (2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings indicate the effect of stress-based tension that can moderate the relationship between the effectiveness of safety training and the motivational problem of taking shortcuts via routine perception-based errors. The theorized moderating effect was employed to examine the strong influences of the relationship in the mediating effect, called as the moderated mediation effect (Pezeshki et al., 2017) and it can be represented as shown in Fig. 3.
Fig.
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%