2014
DOI: 10.3126/ijls.v8i4.10931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and Reliability of Sickle Cell Self-efficacy Scale

Abstract: Correction: On 20/08/2014 the spelling of the third author was changed from Bijan Keykhah DehdeziTO Bijan Keikhaeidehdezi.Correction: On 20/08/2014 the affiliation of the first author was changed fromMusculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences of Ahvaz, IranTO Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran Abstract:Background: psychometric properties of a 9-item self-appraisal scale for studying self-e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The score of the scale is categorized into three levels of low SE (9–20.99), moderate SE (21–32.99), and high SE (33–45). This scale was translated and validated into the Persian language [ 32 ]. In the present study, the reliability of the SCSES was satisfactory using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (0.80).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The score of the scale is categorized into three levels of low SE (9–20.99), moderate SE (21–32.99), and high SE (33–45). This scale was translated and validated into the Persian language [ 32 ]. In the present study, the reliability of the SCSES was satisfactory using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (0.80).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, adolescents (aged 12–17) completed the SCSES, a nine‐item scale developed specifically to assess adolescents’ and adults’ self‐appraisals of their ability, related to SCD, to participate in everyday activities 34 . The SCSES is widely used in sickle cell research and has shown high reliability and validity, 34–36 with a Cronbach alpha of .77 in the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 73%